Home > Articles

Interview - Anonymous

Interview courtesy of Markt+Technik

Part I: Personal Questions Answered

1. Why did you decide to publish this anonymously?

This was, as I remember, a joint decision made by Macmillan and myself. Whilst in America, a criminal record is not particularly damaging, in many other countries, it is. Mind you, the United States convicted me of only one major crime in my lifetime. However, I have been arrested many times. Many years ago, I was a professional thief (and a good one), a gentleman swindler, a courier of contraband, and even once had half a stake in a brothel. In contrast, the majority of Macmillan's (now Pearson's) authors are good people, with good hearts, good histories, fine minds and, in many cases, good Christians, Jews, and Muslims of good standing in their respective communities. Putting my name to anything printed is tantamount to dousing it with gasoline and lighting it on fire.

2. What do you want to hide?

I have many reasons to hide, not the least of which I mentioned above. But, since you want the real dirt on me, I may as well spill it. (Your readers ought to get a thrill out of this, yes? That's what interviews are for, no?) First, my personal life is, by American standards, appalling, and largely incongruous with my public image. In many areas of concern (including law, history, and political commentary), I have what initially seems like an acceptable reputation. For example, you'll find me in both "Who's Who in the World:" and "Who's Who in America", for I support various legal organizations, I belong to many so-called conservative societies, and I have some rather unusual achievements for which I am recognized. I'm a conservative journalist (under yet another name) and so on. My private life, however, is so very different that if the two were ever set side-by-side, I would lose tremendous public status. For example, I am married (as Macmillan has described in the short bio in the books I write) to a wonderful woman. However, we also live with another woman. That is, "we" are three, not two. We eat together, live together, sleep together (in the same bed), and so forth. Perhaps in Germany, this isn't such an offense (except in the Church's eyes), but here, this is considered deviant. This is a predilection I've had for many years (long before I met my wife). I prefer the company of two women (so shoot me). Furthermore, I maintain unusual political beliefs - some of which are unlawful in Germany and many other EU nations.

3. Why didn't you use a pen name to be anonymous?

I do, but not for the Maximum Security series. I've written books on computers and several other subjects, but always under different nom de plumes (never the same one, unless it's a second or third edition). I'd love to give you the names but if I did, my sales in this or that market might plummet. (For example, I'm a romance novelist under a woman's name).

4. What are your feelings about the security situation with the expanding use of the internet as a place to go shopping?

That depends. In the particular, it's fine. In the universal, it's not safe at all. That is to say, you, as a single person, charging something at a web site, are probably safe (providing the site you buy from offers high encryption, etc). However, in the larger picture, when thefts do occur, it's hundreds of thousands of credit cards that thieves compromise, not just one or two. If yours is on the stolen list, you're in trouble. I recommend getting a credit card expressly for Internet purchases that has a set limit (say, one thousand dollars) and only use that. This way, you limit your possible exposure.

5. How old are you?

36. I was born November 24, 1964 at 12:00 am EST at 73.59.5 West and 40.45 North (for all you good German astrologers out there. Heh).

6. What was your first contact with computers?

I was defending physicians and hospitals against the government and insurance companies. My job was to prevent patients' and lawyers' claims from prevailing. This naturally entailed using computers. (I was a baddy, but good at what I did. Of 3,000 cases, I lost six. Not a bad batting average).

7. When was your first contact with the Internet or with ARPAnet?


8. I can remember the feeling of awe the first time I was in the net. Was your first time similar?

For me, the Internet represents approximately 4,000 years of human knowledge. The fact that I can reach into that mess and find whatever I want is amazing. Want to perform an appendectomy? Look it up...you'll find instructional videos, diagrams, articles, and so on. Want to build a nuclear weapon? No problem. Want to email and converse with folks who have? No problem. In this respect, yes....there is an element of awe. The Internet is the largest supercomputer in the world, but instead of circuit boards and wires, it's made of human brains, flesh, and bone. That's a lot of power. Anyone who experiences it and isn't awed by that is probably not thinking clearly.

9. Did you study computer science?

Despite that I have (depending on which tester you ask) an IQ of 179 or 181, I never even went to high school. The last grade I completed was grade 9. What does that tell you? That even people with high IQs can be idiots and imbeciles. Heh. And me, I'm the all-time, heavyweight champion of that rule. I've probably written over 30,000 published pages, authored, co-authored, or edited 17 books, and beaten some of the best law firms in America at strategy and still...I'm your average idiot. A regular man of the people. I drink Edelweiss, smoke Dunhills, and eat German food twice a week (at Old Vienna in Ventura, California, one of the best and most authentic German eateries in the US). But don't let that fool you. I've read over 4,000 books in my life (or just shy of one for every three days I've been alive). About 1/10th of those were hardcore compsci books. I code well enough to make a living at it in C, C++, VB, SQL, PL/SQL (even with Oracle OCI, which is a dog), perl, awk, sed, the shells, python, REXX (don't laugh now), Envelop (VB knockoff), BusinessBasic (ProvideX), AION, and of course, php, jscript, javascript, vbscript, blah, blah. But no...I've never even seen the inside of a university (though, I've spent enough time in fraternity houses, drinking chiefly German beer, Irish whiskey, and so forth).

10. What are the personal reasons and interests which brought you to the field of Network security?

I wanted to build a system that would allow folks to communicate without the prying eyes of government looking over their shoulders. I'm a privacy freak. Most of my clients now are financial groups, CPA firms, and political or underworld organizations (like Neo-Nazis or organized crime groups who want to talk without the FBI listening. And believe me....the FBI does listen). As soon as I realized that SAIC controls (to some degree) the Net, I was disenchanted (just as you folks are disenchanted about Echelon). The freedom to think and speak as you wish (except in extraordinary circumstances) in private, without interference, is to me sacrosanct.

11. How often do you *really* change your passwords?

Me? Hah. About once a month. I have to. Our network gets hacked about every three months, chiefly because I'm lazy. Sometimes, after I kick them off, I give especially talented hackers shell accounts and we become good friends. One kid from Korea (who was really very good) has an account on my mail server now. His break-in was so cool.....so smooth and quiet. I was MD5-ing files for a week just to rout all his little tools. When I traced him back to his original hiding place, I could nothing but congratulate him. His website was really cool, too. PHP specialist, and a raging one. So, we hang out now. He turned me on to an AWESOME Korean eatery in Manhattan (next to the Martinique Holiday Inn in the 30s. It stays open 24 hours and has killer BBQ).

12. When testing the network security of your clients, what was the weirdest, funniest, strangest thing which happened?

There's a company that created a brilliant way to find suppliers and buyers. (Their system kicks UDDI's ass in my opinion). In the early stages of establishing their network, their tech team asked me to come in. They had a weird situation where huge amounts of bandwidth were showing up in their logs. They couldn't figure it out, and they were worried that insiders were sending information to a competitor. Here's what was really happening: the development team had created one of the largest pirated MP3 servers I've ever seen. We're talking about thousands of songs from 1975 to 1999. It was, in my opinion, the coolest system ever, and their graphics were outstanding. Now, what would you do? If the kids were found out, they would all be fired. Answer: I talked to the development team privately and moved their server to a big ISP I had good contacts with. Problem solved. Everybody was happy. (I used that MP3 server for about a year, until the kids finally took it down. It was great....they had a lot of B-sides that you never, ever hear on the radio anymore).

13. Based on your experience, what is the maximum size a company can be without at least a part time security expert?

About 20 people. Beyond that, you have a problem (that is, if your enterprise relies strictly or even largely on computers connected to the outside).

14. You once had problems with the law due to your ATM hack, as have groups like the Chaos Computer Club for similar stunts here in Germany. While pointing out the weaknesses in such systems, aren't you at the same time inviting criminals to attack them? Shouldn't this kind of information enjoy special legal protection?

Awww. I should clear something up, even at Pearson's expense. I wasn't pointing out a flaw. I was exploiting it. For 2 1/2 years (according to the US government), I used that flaw to obtain an unlimited supply of twenty-dollar bills. Partnered with two girls (an Austrian-English ballet dancer whose father was a rocket scientist and a pure-blooded Irish lass who was an animal activist), I roamed the US, staying in expensive hotels, eating at five-stars, chartering planes, and so on) In other words, I was no altruistic hacker. I was a common thief who knew how to hack the banking system. But to answer your more important question, no. No information (except matters of national security) should have special legal protection. Think about it. Our children's children will learn at a rate 1,000 faster than we did, merely because Berners-Lee figured out a non-linear way to traverse technical information. Forget Gutenberg. Berners-Lee did something incredible, and the press pales in comparison. Truth and technical information should always be free (except when it's trade secret, proprietary, and so on). I'm a strange guy, you see....I favor Adam Smith, I hate antitrust laws (and side with Judge Bork here), but I also believe that information should be (except in extraordinary cases) free. And no....if there's a weakness, everyone should know about it so that it can be fixed. I'm with the guys at securityfocus.com, but even more so. Only through full disclosure can we be free. Would you want your personal physician to hide information about your cancer? Hardly. So why should weaknesses not be public? Of course, I believe that the sufferer should be given adequate time to shore up his system. You don't just publish a weakness without first giving fair warning. That's not hacking, that's cracking. And cracking might be fun, but doesn't show much civic responsibility.

15. How does one judge if a network security company is good and knows what they talking about, if one does not understand a lot about computer networking? Is there a set of standards or a check list which can help company managers who have to make such judgements?

Oooh. That's a loaded question. The truth is, all the certification in the world doesn't mean a thing. Certification - at least here - is a hustle. It's a way for companies to make money. For example, take certain unnamed organizations that offer a security seal that you put on your website. Some such seals cost you 100 grand or more. In many cases, they're worthless. I know a girl who has no certification at all (but who graduated summa cum laude from a certain university). This girl doesn't dress in 1,000.00 suits, she doesn't work for the Big Five, or any other such thing. She has sky-blue hair (it's really blonde), and dresses Goth, has black fingernails, hates authority, and is one of the hottest chicks you'll ever meet. (I can call her a chick because I know her. Someone else calls her that, she might deck 'em, right then and there). I trust this girl to secure a network more than 1,000 CPAs working in concert. And if you read 2600, or if you personally know Kevin Mitnik, or Kevin Poulsen, you know who she is. Network security companies that are "good" are companies run by real hackers (like CounterPane). Tools are okay (ISS has some good ones, just like CA), but when it comes down to it, you want folks who eat, live, and breath security (fellahs like Dan Farmer. Anyone remember him? At a time when few people thought about data integrity testing - except for Yee and Spafford - Farmer was on it. He wrote the coolest little utility called FUCK. This utility checked sigs against your installation media to determine if anything had changed. It was in a share file, and is now impossible to find. Farmer loved security). Any firm that walks in with checklists (ripped from one of my books, or Hacking Exposed, or the Australian CERT folks) is probably just "okay". They do their walkthrough, bother your system administrators with a bunch of silly questions, run ISS, and charge you a fortune. Bah. You want folks that know their stuff. And every job is different. For example, some jobs require programmers, not necessarily security folks. One company (huge in Europe) asked me to figure out how to prevent outsiders from spinning bogus mail off their Domino server. Come on. That's IBM's problem, and it should have been fixed. They wanted me to write a custom wrapper. I laughed and said I'd charge them 8 grand to do it. Instead, they went with someone (on Madison Avenue) that will probably charge then 200,000.00 and sell them a bunch of irrelevant tools. That's a warning sign, by the way. If a company walks in and starts their reselling pitch without really understanding your problem, give them the boot. I've seen cases where a 30-line shell script would have done the trick and the hapless customer ended up buying 300,000.00 worth of resold security tools - that these didn't even address the original problem. You want people who know their stuff. Let your security administrators interview them. If they don't pass that hurdle in a satisfactory manner, forget 'em. If you had ever been inside a board room meeting of such security companies (as I have), you'd be appalled. Snake oil abounds.

InformIT Promotional Mailings & Special Offers

I would like to receive exclusive offers and hear about products from InformIT and its family of brands. I can unsubscribe at any time.


Pearson Education, Inc., 221 River Street, Hoboken, New Jersey 07030, (Pearson) presents this site to provide information about products and services that can be purchased through this site.

This privacy notice provides an overview of our commitment to privacy and describes how we collect, protect, use and share personal information collected through this site. Please note that other Pearson websites and online products and services have their own separate privacy policies.

Collection and Use of Information

To conduct business and deliver products and services, Pearson collects and uses personal information in several ways in connection with this site, including:

Questions and Inquiries

For inquiries and questions, we collect the inquiry or question, together with name, contact details (email address, phone number and mailing address) and any other additional information voluntarily submitted to us through a Contact Us form or an email. We use this information to address the inquiry and respond to the question.

Online Store

For orders and purchases placed through our online store on this site, we collect order details, name, institution name and address (if applicable), email address, phone number, shipping and billing addresses, credit/debit card information, shipping options and any instructions. We use this information to complete transactions, fulfill orders, communicate with individuals placing orders or visiting the online store, and for related purposes.


Pearson may offer opportunities to provide feedback or participate in surveys, including surveys evaluating Pearson products, services or sites. Participation is voluntary. Pearson collects information requested in the survey questions and uses the information to evaluate, support, maintain and improve products, services or sites, develop new products and services, conduct educational research and for other purposes specified in the survey.

Contests and Drawings

Occasionally, we may sponsor a contest or drawing. Participation is optional. Pearson collects name, contact information and other information specified on the entry form for the contest or drawing to conduct the contest or drawing. Pearson may collect additional personal information from the winners of a contest or drawing in order to award the prize and for tax reporting purposes, as required by law.


If you have elected to receive email newsletters or promotional mailings and special offers but want to unsubscribe, simply email information@informit.com.

Service Announcements

On rare occasions it is necessary to send out a strictly service related announcement. For instance, if our service is temporarily suspended for maintenance we might send users an email. Generally, users may not opt-out of these communications, though they can deactivate their account information. However, these communications are not promotional in nature.

Customer Service

We communicate with users on a regular basis to provide requested services and in regard to issues relating to their account we reply via email or phone in accordance with the users' wishes when a user submits their information through our Contact Us form.

Other Collection and Use of Information

Application and System Logs

Pearson automatically collects log data to help ensure the delivery, availability and security of this site. Log data may include technical information about how a user or visitor connected to this site, such as browser type, type of computer/device, operating system, internet service provider and IP address. We use this information for support purposes and to monitor the health of the site, identify problems, improve service, detect unauthorized access and fraudulent activity, prevent and respond to security incidents and appropriately scale computing resources.

Web Analytics

Pearson may use third party web trend analytical services, including Google Analytics, to collect visitor information, such as IP addresses, browser types, referring pages, pages visited and time spent on a particular site. While these analytical services collect and report information on an anonymous basis, they may use cookies to gather web trend information. The information gathered may enable Pearson (but not the third party web trend services) to link information with application and system log data. Pearson uses this information for system administration and to identify problems, improve service, detect unauthorized access and fraudulent activity, prevent and respond to security incidents, appropriately scale computing resources and otherwise support and deliver this site and its services.

Cookies and Related Technologies

This site uses cookies and similar technologies to personalize content, measure traffic patterns, control security, track use and access of information on this site, and provide interest-based messages and advertising. Users can manage and block the use of cookies through their browser. Disabling or blocking certain cookies may limit the functionality of this site.

Do Not Track

This site currently does not respond to Do Not Track signals.


Pearson uses appropriate physical, administrative and technical security measures to protect personal information from unauthorized access, use and disclosure.


This site is not directed to children under the age of 13.


Pearson may send or direct marketing communications to users, provided that

  • Pearson will not use personal information collected or processed as a K-12 school service provider for the purpose of directed or targeted advertising.
  • Such marketing is consistent with applicable law and Pearson's legal obligations.
  • Pearson will not knowingly direct or send marketing communications to an individual who has expressed a preference not to receive marketing.
  • Where required by applicable law, express or implied consent to marketing exists and has not been withdrawn.

Pearson may provide personal information to a third party service provider on a restricted basis to provide marketing solely on behalf of Pearson or an affiliate or customer for whom Pearson is a service provider. Marketing preferences may be changed at any time.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user's personally identifiable information changes (such as your postal address or email address), we provide a way to correct or update that user's personal data provided to us. This can be done on the Account page. If a user no longer desires our service and desires to delete his or her account, please contact us at customer-service@informit.com and we will process the deletion of a user's account.


Users can always make an informed choice as to whether they should proceed with certain services offered by InformIT. If you choose to remove yourself from our mailing list(s) simply visit the following page and uncheck any communication you no longer want to receive: www.informit.com/u.aspx.

Sale of Personal Information

Pearson does not rent or sell personal information in exchange for any payment of money.

While Pearson does not sell personal information, as defined in Nevada law, Nevada residents may email a request for no sale of their personal information to NevadaDesignatedRequest@pearson.com.

Supplemental Privacy Statement for California Residents

California residents should read our Supplemental privacy statement for California residents in conjunction with this Privacy Notice. The Supplemental privacy statement for California residents explains Pearson's commitment to comply with California law and applies to personal information of California residents collected in connection with this site and the Services.

Sharing and Disclosure

Pearson may disclose personal information, as follows:

  • As required by law.
  • With the consent of the individual (or their parent, if the individual is a minor)
  • In response to a subpoena, court order or legal process, to the extent permitted or required by law
  • To protect the security and safety of individuals, data, assets and systems, consistent with applicable law
  • In connection the sale, joint venture or other transfer of some or all of its company or assets, subject to the provisions of this Privacy Notice
  • To investigate or address actual or suspected fraud or other illegal activities
  • To exercise its legal rights, including enforcement of the Terms of Use for this site or another contract
  • To affiliated Pearson companies and other companies and organizations who perform work for Pearson and are obligated to protect the privacy of personal information consistent with this Privacy Notice
  • To a school, organization, company or government agency, where Pearson collects or processes the personal information in a school setting or on behalf of such organization, company or government agency.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that we are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of each and every web site that collects Personal Information. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this web site.

Requests and Contact

Please contact us about this Privacy Notice or if you have any requests or questions relating to the privacy of your personal information.

Changes to this Privacy Notice

We may revise this Privacy Notice through an updated posting. We will identify the effective date of the revision in the posting. Often, updates are made to provide greater clarity or to comply with changes in regulatory requirements. If the updates involve material changes to the collection, protection, use or disclosure of Personal Information, Pearson will provide notice of the change through a conspicuous notice on this site or other appropriate way. Continued use of the site after the effective date of a posted revision evidences acceptance. Please contact us if you have questions or concerns about the Privacy Notice or any objection to any revisions.

Last Update: November 17, 2020