Home > Articles > Data

  • Print
  • + Share This
This chapter is from the book

This chapter is from the book

The Goldilocks Zone of Indexes

Astronomers have coined the term Goldilocks Zone to describe the zone around a star that could sustain a habitable planet. In essence, the zone that is not too close to the sun (too hot) or too far away (too cold) is just right. When you design a document database, you also want to try to identify the right number of indexes. You do not want too few, which could lead to poor read performance, and you do not want too many, which could lead to poor write performance.

Read-Heavy Applications

Some applications have a high percentage of read operations relative to the number of write operations. Business intelligence and other analytic applications can fall into this category. Read-heavy applications should have indexes on virtually all fields used to help filter results. For example, if it was common for users to query documents from a particular sales region or with order items in a certain product category, then the sales region and product category fields should be indexed.

It is sometimes difficult to know which fields will be used to filter results. This can occur in business intelligence applications. An analyst may explore data sets and choose a variety of different fields as filters. Each time he runs a new query, he may learn something new that leads him to issue another query with a different set of filter fields. This iterative process can continue as long as the analyst gains insight from queries.

Read-heavy applications can have a large number of indexes, especially when the query patterns are unknown. It is not unusual to index most fields that could be used to filter results in an analytic application (see Figure 8.9).

Figure 8.9

Figure 8.9 Querying analytic databases is an iterative process. Virtually any field could potentially be used to filter results. In such cases, indexes may be created on most fields.

Write-Heavy Applications

Write-heavy applications are those with relatively high percentages of write operations relative to read operations. The document database that receives the truck sensor data described previously would likely be a write-heavy database. Because indexes are data structures that must be created and updated, their use will consume CPU, persistent storage, and memory resources and increase the time needed to insert or update a document in the database.

Data modelers tend to try to minimize the number of indexes in write-heavy applications. Essential indexes, such as those created for fields storing the identifiers of related documents, should be in place. As with other design choices, deciding on the number of indexes in a write-heavy application is a matter of balancing competing interests.

Fewer indexes typically correlate with faster updates but potentially slower reads. If users performing read operations can tolerate some delay in receiving results, then minimizing indexes should be considered. If, however, it is important for users to have low-latency queries against a write-heavy database, consider implementing a second database that aggregates the data according to the time-intensive read queries. This is the basic model used in business intelligence.

Transaction processing systems are designed for fast writes and targeted reads. Data is copied from that database using an extraction, transformation, and load (ETL) process and placed in a data mart or data warehouse. The latter two types of databases are usually heavily indexed to improve query response time (see Figure 8.10).

Figure 8.10

Figure 8.10 When both write-heavy and read-heavy applications must be supported, a two-database solution may be the best option.

  • + Share This
  • 🔖 Save To Your Account