Home > Articles > Web Development

That One Thing: Reduce Coupling for More Scalable and Sustainable Software

Stephen Vance, author of Quality Code: Software Testing Principles, Practices, and Patterns, explains how loosening the coupling in your tests will make your tests easier to write and less brittle to maintain. The same principles will improve the design of your software and hopefully extend its useful and maintainable life.
Like this article? We recommend

How many times have you heard someone say, “I make a change and all the tests break” or “Testing doesn’t work because tests are brittle”?

These kinds of comments regularly surface in software development circles. They usually accompany explanations of why quality isn’t what it should be or tests shouldn’t be written. These statements share an underlying cause. If you read the title of the article, you know what it is: coupling.

Coupling is simply the computer science word for dependencies. It is the degree to which code modules rely on other code modules. Larry Constantine invented it as a metric over 40 years ago for Structured Design. With a little adaptation to object-orientation and newer language concepts, it’s as relevant today as it was then.

Coupling impacts our work on many levels, but we’ll focus on the micro level, the coupling of tests to production code that is squarely in the realm of our day-to-day applied software craftsmanship.

Necessary Coupling

It’s easy to overlook the ways in which our software is coupled. It tends to be more obvious in strongly and statically typed languages than in weakly or dynamically typed ones. (Note: By “strongly typed” I mean that data has a strong sense of type rather than that strict type-safety is enforced). Thus, it’s easier to see it in C++ and Java (strong and static) than it might be in Ruby (strongish and dynamic) and JavaScript (weakish and dynamic), which in turn show coupling more easily than Bourne Shell (weak and dynamic).

For this exploration, let’s assume an object-oriented context because it gives us a fairly complete set of the types of coupling available. We’ll use tests for many of the examples as coupling is more often overlooked in tests than in the application code.

Let’s start with the most apparent forms of coupling in Java.

public void testCalculateResult() {
  Something sut = new Something();
  Argument input = new Argument();
  Result result = sut.calculateResult(input);

Some forms of coupling are unavoidable in tests. This test depends on

  1. the class it is testing (Something),
  2. the constructor for the class,
  3. the method it is testing (calculateResult),
  4. the type of the argument to the method (Argument),
  5. the constructor to the argument type, and
  6. the return type of the method (Result).

Are you surprised that we have six points of coupling in a fairly simple test? And that’s without testing anything meaningful about result using getters or setting any attributes of input through constructor arguments or setters.

So why does this matter? Your test is now subject to change based on potential changes in three classes. In this case, they’re part of the interface, so unless the interface is simplified to reduce the number of participating types, it’s what we have.

The Chains That Bind

Here is another tragically common scenario, if you’ll forgive the melodramatic characterization, this time in JavaScript.

it('gets what it gets', function() {

Obviously, we’re dependent on chain and its type and its getLock method. But wait! The getLock method returns a type with a getKey method that in turn returns a type, which we assume to be the same type as theRightKey. We’ve now added three more couplings that aren’t inherently part of the module we’re testing.

Commonly, methods like getLock are lazy wrappers around an implementation type; more on that in a moment, but it implies we’re testing implementation rather than intent. Without static typing, we’re even making assumptions the type returned and the presence of the successive getKey method. We’re transitively coupling ourselves to the representation of the lock.

So what can we do about this? I would either just verify that the lock was the expected lock, perhaps with something that tested the deep equality necessary to verify the key, or I would add a getKey method to chain that hid the implementation detail of the lock. Either way, the test would no longer be coupled to the implementation, and the interface would no longer force its clients to couple to the implementation.

Contain Yourself

Going back to Java, let’s look a little more closely at the problems with implementation types.

public void testGetCustomers() {
  ArrayList<String> customers = sut.getCustomers();

Most Java programmers know you shouldn’t use concrete types in your interfaces. That avoids coupling to the implementation. So what if we changed ArrayList to just be List?

public void testGetCustomers() {
  List<String> customers = sut.getCustomers();

We’ve improved things, but is it good enough? Is it important to the test that this is a list? A list is an implementation decision predicated on the need for ordered storage. If the test will sort it anyway, verify set-wise equality, or simply iterate over the members, the test (and perhaps the return type of getCustomers) can be changed to use Collection or even Iterable instead of List. This would also provide resilience should you later decide that the customers were better represented with some form of Set or other Collection.

On the one hand, this is all basic algorithmics. On the other, I’ve seen many developers painstakingly choose their internal representation, pay little thought to their return types, and write their tests unquestioningly.

To Kill A Mocking Test

I often hear developers talking casually about testing code via “mocks.” Sometimes this decodes as meaning any form of test double. Other times this means they are using a self-proclaimed mocking framework to test. Yet other times they are ardent practitioners of the Mockist arts or unquestioning FactoryGirl users.

First of all, know your test doubles. A dummy simply holds a place. A stub returns a canned value. A spy records interactions for later verification. A mock verifies as many interactions as possible during execution. A fake substitutes a lighter-weight implementation for a heavier one. Just as not all tests written with JUnit are unit tests, not all test doubles created with a mocking framework are mocks. Most mocking frameworks can create any type of test double; some “mocking frameworks” can’t really create mocks by this definition.

The key to choosing test doubles is to realize that each type incurs a different degree of coupling. In general, prefer no double over a dummy over a stub over a spy over a mock. Fakes are different and outside of the hierarchy, more commonly a tool of necessity than of choice.

At the extreme end of the Mockist spectrum, you have those for which every testing problem deserves a mock. Arlo Belshee wrote an excellent blog post called “The No Mocks Book” including some follow on from Steve Freeman and others that highlights some more absurd consequences of a mocks-only approach such as over-engineering.

Let’s look at the more subtle differences between the other test doubles. In general, a double takes the place of some element of the interface or implementation of the software under test. Leveraging that observation with our perspective from the earlier examples, we can analyze the remaining doubles.

The most common use of a dummy fills in a parameter in a calling list that is syntactically required but otherwise unnecessary for the test. In that case, a dummy uses a type that the interface already requires. Its construction can incur additional coupling, but it is otherwise benign. If the system already has null-object implementations, they make great dummies.

A stub fills a place like a dummy, but also provides canned responses to certain interactions. Interactions imply methods and responses imply return types and their possible construction beyond the needs of a dummy. The additional three points of coupling make it a slightly more binding form of test double.

Spies record interactions for later verification. Interactions also imply methods. Recording method invocations suggests storage corresponding to the parameters, their types, and possibly other attributes such as invocation counts and information about known side effects. Spies also tend to be used in clusters, multiplying the degree of coupling.

Finally, mocks have all of the characteristics of spies, plus they encapsulate specific expectations during execution. Note that there are things that mocks can’t verify on the fly until they know the test is finished. For example, it can easily trigger an assertion when the test invokes a method more times than expected, but it can’t know it was invoked less than expected until you explicitly tell it the test is done.

Another, more insidious form of coupling comes with mocks. The poster child for mocks is the purely behavioral method, such as a method whose job is only to orchestrate calls to other methods. The sneaky coupling comes in the binding to behavior, something that compilers and syntax checkers don’t understand. This is a raw form of coupling to the implementation rather than the intent that comes hand-in-hand with many uses of mocks.

Hang Loose

Hopefully, I’ve started you toward a thorough understanding of how coupling impacts your tests and the options for minimizing and avoiding it. Like most aspects of craftsmanship, intentional practice builds the skills that you can apply more effortlessly in your day-to-day routine. Take some time to really ponder how you can loosen the coupling in your tests. You will find your tests become easier to write and less brittle to maintain. The same principles will improve the design of your software and hopefully extend its useful and maintainable life.

InformIT Promotional Mailings & Special Offers

I would like to receive exclusive offers and hear about products from InformIT and its family of brands. I can unsubscribe at any time.


Pearson Education, Inc., 221 River Street, Hoboken, New Jersey 07030, (Pearson) presents this site to provide information about products and services that can be purchased through this site.

This privacy notice provides an overview of our commitment to privacy and describes how we collect, protect, use and share personal information collected through this site. Please note that other Pearson websites and online products and services have their own separate privacy policies.

Collection and Use of Information

To conduct business and deliver products and services, Pearson collects and uses personal information in several ways in connection with this site, including:

Questions and Inquiries

For inquiries and questions, we collect the inquiry or question, together with name, contact details (email address, phone number and mailing address) and any other additional information voluntarily submitted to us through a Contact Us form or an email. We use this information to address the inquiry and respond to the question.

Online Store

For orders and purchases placed through our online store on this site, we collect order details, name, institution name and address (if applicable), email address, phone number, shipping and billing addresses, credit/debit card information, shipping options and any instructions. We use this information to complete transactions, fulfill orders, communicate with individuals placing orders or visiting the online store, and for related purposes.


Pearson may offer opportunities to provide feedback or participate in surveys, including surveys evaluating Pearson products, services or sites. Participation is voluntary. Pearson collects information requested in the survey questions and uses the information to evaluate, support, maintain and improve products, services or sites, develop new products and services, conduct educational research and for other purposes specified in the survey.

Contests and Drawings

Occasionally, we may sponsor a contest or drawing. Participation is optional. Pearson collects name, contact information and other information specified on the entry form for the contest or drawing to conduct the contest or drawing. Pearson may collect additional personal information from the winners of a contest or drawing in order to award the prize and for tax reporting purposes, as required by law.


If you have elected to receive email newsletters or promotional mailings and special offers but want to unsubscribe, simply email information@informit.com.

Service Announcements

On rare occasions it is necessary to send out a strictly service related announcement. For instance, if our service is temporarily suspended for maintenance we might send users an email. Generally, users may not opt-out of these communications, though they can deactivate their account information. However, these communications are not promotional in nature.

Customer Service

We communicate with users on a regular basis to provide requested services and in regard to issues relating to their account we reply via email or phone in accordance with the users' wishes when a user submits their information through our Contact Us form.

Other Collection and Use of Information

Application and System Logs

Pearson automatically collects log data to help ensure the delivery, availability and security of this site. Log data may include technical information about how a user or visitor connected to this site, such as browser type, type of computer/device, operating system, internet service provider and IP address. We use this information for support purposes and to monitor the health of the site, identify problems, improve service, detect unauthorized access and fraudulent activity, prevent and respond to security incidents and appropriately scale computing resources.

Web Analytics

Pearson may use third party web trend analytical services, including Google Analytics, to collect visitor information, such as IP addresses, browser types, referring pages, pages visited and time spent on a particular site. While these analytical services collect and report information on an anonymous basis, they may use cookies to gather web trend information. The information gathered may enable Pearson (but not the third party web trend services) to link information with application and system log data. Pearson uses this information for system administration and to identify problems, improve service, detect unauthorized access and fraudulent activity, prevent and respond to security incidents, appropriately scale computing resources and otherwise support and deliver this site and its services.

Cookies and Related Technologies

This site uses cookies and similar technologies to personalize content, measure traffic patterns, control security, track use and access of information on this site, and provide interest-based messages and advertising. Users can manage and block the use of cookies through their browser. Disabling or blocking certain cookies may limit the functionality of this site.

Do Not Track

This site currently does not respond to Do Not Track signals.


Pearson uses appropriate physical, administrative and technical security measures to protect personal information from unauthorized access, use and disclosure.


This site is not directed to children under the age of 13.


Pearson may send or direct marketing communications to users, provided that

  • Pearson will not use personal information collected or processed as a K-12 school service provider for the purpose of directed or targeted advertising.
  • Such marketing is consistent with applicable law and Pearson's legal obligations.
  • Pearson will not knowingly direct or send marketing communications to an individual who has expressed a preference not to receive marketing.
  • Where required by applicable law, express or implied consent to marketing exists and has not been withdrawn.

Pearson may provide personal information to a third party service provider on a restricted basis to provide marketing solely on behalf of Pearson or an affiliate or customer for whom Pearson is a service provider. Marketing preferences may be changed at any time.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user's personally identifiable information changes (such as your postal address or email address), we provide a way to correct or update that user's personal data provided to us. This can be done on the Account page. If a user no longer desires our service and desires to delete his or her account, please contact us at customer-service@informit.com and we will process the deletion of a user's account.


Users can always make an informed choice as to whether they should proceed with certain services offered by InformIT. If you choose to remove yourself from our mailing list(s) simply visit the following page and uncheck any communication you no longer want to receive: www.informit.com/u.aspx.

Sale of Personal Information

Pearson does not rent or sell personal information in exchange for any payment of money.

While Pearson does not sell personal information, as defined in Nevada law, Nevada residents may email a request for no sale of their personal information to NevadaDesignatedRequest@pearson.com.

Supplemental Privacy Statement for California Residents

California residents should read our Supplemental privacy statement for California residents in conjunction with this Privacy Notice. The Supplemental privacy statement for California residents explains Pearson's commitment to comply with California law and applies to personal information of California residents collected in connection with this site and the Services.

Sharing and Disclosure

Pearson may disclose personal information, as follows:

  • As required by law.
  • With the consent of the individual (or their parent, if the individual is a minor)
  • In response to a subpoena, court order or legal process, to the extent permitted or required by law
  • To protect the security and safety of individuals, data, assets and systems, consistent with applicable law
  • In connection the sale, joint venture or other transfer of some or all of its company or assets, subject to the provisions of this Privacy Notice
  • To investigate or address actual or suspected fraud or other illegal activities
  • To exercise its legal rights, including enforcement of the Terms of Use for this site or another contract
  • To affiliated Pearson companies and other companies and organizations who perform work for Pearson and are obligated to protect the privacy of personal information consistent with this Privacy Notice
  • To a school, organization, company or government agency, where Pearson collects or processes the personal information in a school setting or on behalf of such organization, company or government agency.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that we are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of each and every web site that collects Personal Information. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this web site.

Requests and Contact

Please contact us about this Privacy Notice or if you have any requests or questions relating to the privacy of your personal information.

Changes to this Privacy Notice

We may revise this Privacy Notice through an updated posting. We will identify the effective date of the revision in the posting. Often, updates are made to provide greater clarity or to comply with changes in regulatory requirements. If the updates involve material changes to the collection, protection, use or disclosure of Personal Information, Pearson will provide notice of the change through a conspicuous notice on this site or other appropriate way. Continued use of the site after the effective date of a posted revision evidences acceptance. Please contact us if you have questions or concerns about the Privacy Notice or any objection to any revisions.

Last Update: November 17, 2020