Home > Articles > Engineering > Semiconductor Technologies

Scheduling Challenges with ARM's big.LITTLE Architecture

  • Print
  • + Share This
big.LITTLE is an ARM marketing term for a relatively simple concept. David Chisnall explains what big.LITTLE and similar strategies will mean for operating systems designers over the coming years.
Like this article? We recommend

One of the latest buzzwords to come out of ARM's marketing department is big.LITTLE—no doubt someone spent many seconds of creativity to come up with the idea of capitalizing the word little. In spite of the name, which makes me cringe slightly whenever I type it, the idea is quite interesting.

The concept behind big.LITTLE is to include multiple cores with the same instruction set on a single die. This idea is interesting because it's somewhere between traditional symmetric multiprocessing (SMP)-although obviously not symmetric-and heterogeneous multicore. The instruction sets of all the cores are the same, but their performance characteristics are very different.

Current implementations use a mixture of the Cortex-A15 and Cortex-A7 cores. (Apparently ARM's creative genius also extends to naming cores.) The A7 is an impressive piece of engineering. Its performance is similar to that of the Cortex A8 (though it's better, and therefore has a lower number), but in a smaller die area and at much lower power, and tweaked to understand a newer version of the instruction set. You may remember that the A8 was ARM's flagship mobile core a few years ago; it's now quite long in the tooth. The A15 is the successor to the A9. (It's better, and therefore has a higher number. No, it doesn't make sense to me either.) The A15 is very different internally from the A7. The A7 is an in-order architecture with limited superscalar features (dual-issue, if you hit the right combination of instructions), and the A15 is an out-of-order superscalar monster.

Of course, this extra performance from the A15 comes at a cost. It's ARM's fastest core by a fairly significant margin, but it's also ARM's most power-hungry core by a similar amount. Stick an A15 in a mobile phone, and you'll get strong biceps from lifting the battery to your ear. This is why ARM pairs the A15 with the A7: Both can run the same code, but the A15 will run much faster-at the expense of power consumption.

Unfortunately, the tradeoff isn't that simple. Often, the best way of minimizing power consumption is to let a job run to completion at the processor's highest power state, and then shut it down. For this kind of task, the A15 is more power-efficient. For other tasks, it might be the only option; the A7 just won't keep up.

Uniform Memory Architecture

The first generation of big.LITTLE chips from Samsung were buggy, and they lacked one of the most interesting features of later designs: They weren't cache-coherent between the A7 and A9 cores, so the only thing that a scheduler could do was turn on the A15s and turn off the A7s, or vice versa.

More-recent designs are fully cache-coherent between all of the cores. A typical system on chip (SoC) has four of each kind of core. With adequate cooling, you can power all of them at once. More commonly, you might power one A15 for a CPU-limited foreground application, and one or two A7s for everything else.

The large number of possible combinations of cores you can have active dramatically complicates the task of power management for the operating system. With a more conventional SMP system, power management is a two-dimensional problem: How many cores do you want to have active, and at what speed do you want to run them? Core speed is often an independent problem: You schedule jobs as best you can, and then adjust the core speed upward if everything is CPU-bound or downward if it isn't. big.LITTLE adds another dimension: What kinds of core are active?

I imagine that future releases in this series will have more than just fast-and-power-hungry cores versus slow-and-efficient cores. The newly launched A12 is intended to fit between the A7 and A15 in terms of power and performance. (Therefore, in a dramatic break with tradition, this new core has a number that makes some kind of sense.) The A12 will be the big chip in midrange big.LITTLE configurations, and it may well appear in "big.Medium.LITTLE" configurations in the future. (ARM marketing can have that name for free.)

The scheduling question is more complicated for another reason: The cost of migrating a thread between cores is quite expensive, and if you make the wrong scheduling decision then you have to migrate threads between cores. In a traditional SMP setup, a thread is only on the wrong core if you accidentally schedule too many CPU-bound processes on one core, or if you're trying to consolidate more mostly-idle processes on a few cores to power down the others. With big.LITTLE, it's possible for a thread to be on the wrong core for power consumption quite easily if it suddenly switches between CPU-bound and I/O-bound.

Execution History

With systems like this, where making correct scheduling decisions can affect both responsiveness and battery life to a noticeable degree, the operating system needs to be able to predict the behavior of processes. With some processes, this is very easy. For example, a compiler will spend a little bit of time reading files, and then it will allocate a load of memory, sit being CPU-bound for a while, and then write out a file and exit. A few execution traces are all you need to work out that this is probably what will happen every time.

Even with this workload, the correct execution isn't obvious. For example, should it start on an A7 core while it's doing the I/O and then move to the A15 when it stops being I/O-bound? This approach sounds good, but if the system is reading things into cache on the A7 then it will need to fetch them into the A15's cache as well. This design causes bus traffic, which consumes power and reduces performance. On the other hand, running on the A15 means that the power-hungry core is going to be sitting idle while it's waiting for I/O.

Many applications are a lot more "bursty." For example, when you type something into a rich text field in a graphical application, the application will do some work to render the text and may do some extra calculations for autocompletion, spelling correction, and so on. While the user pauses to think, the application may just sit completely idle waiting for events.

Why Bother?

At this point, you're probably wondering whether it's worth the effort. Wouldn't ARM be better off with just one core that can do fine-grained clock scaling? Intel took this route, but it's not necessarily better. Currently, Intel's flagship Atom cores are in approximately the same ballpark as the A15 in terms of power consumption. They have nothing that comes close to the A7, and for good reason: The A7 is designed for power consumption above all else.

An in-order chip like the A7 is significantly simpler, and this shows in the die area. A single A7 core is 0.452 millimeters (plus caches), whereas the A15 is five times this area; you get all four A7 cores in the space of one A15. If they're all busy, those four A7s will also have better performance. The catch, of course, is that keeping them all busy requires a multithreaded workload with perfect work distribution.

The power efficiency of the A7 core is very important for mobile devices, which spend much of their time in idle or almost-idle mode. The almost-idle part is the most important, as many things prevent a tablet or mobile phone from sleeping, without requiring more than a very small amount of CPU power. Running these devices on an Atom or an A15 would be inefficient.

I said earlier that the A15 is an out-of-order chip, but that term hides a lot of complexity. A simple in-order chip decodes an instruction and then pushes it into the next stage of the pipeline to execute. A slightly more complex chip like the A7 might decode two instructions, determine whether they use different execution units and have no interdependencies, and push them into different pipelines if this is the case. A fully out-of-order superscalar chip like the A15 or newer Atoms (or almost any modern desktop or server CPU) decodes multiple instructions, determines their data dependencies, and executes them in the order of their dependencies (or a close approximation).

Any out-of-order superscalar chip will need complex logic for register renaming. Register operands in such a chip are just names used to identify dependencies. It probably needs a store buffer, so memory writes appear in the correct order. It needs a wide instruction decoder so that it can decode multiple instructions simultaneously to determine which to execute. It needs a very complex branch predictor, because a mis-predicted branch is very expensive when lots of speculatively executed instructions are in flight-and with a branch on average every seven instructions, the CPU quickly runs out of work to do without speculative execution.

All of this extra complexity is very hard to disable selectively. Without too much effort, you could probably tweak the A15 to ignore most of the branch predictor state and issue only one or two instructions per clock. You could probably do some power gating to the unused pipelines, although doing this would mean you'd have quite a long delay when you want to bring them back online. But you'd still have all of the register-renaming logic and the extra wiring from the independent arithmetic logic units. You almost certainly wouldn't come close to the A7 in terms of power consumption.

One complaint leveled at ARM over the big.LITTLE model is that they're taking the easy way out in hardware and shoving the complexity into the operating system. Ignoring the fact that designing two power-efficient CPU cores doesn't meet my definition of "easy," this complaint is somewhat legitimate. Taking ARM's approach is easier than trying to design a single core that has the power/performance characteristics of either the A7 or A15, depending on its mode. I doubt that such an approach is actually possible.

Detractors are right, however, to claim that ARM is making the operating system a lot more complex. The burden of power optimizations is certainly placed squarely with the OS writers. On the other hand, the operating system is in the best position to track usage profiles of applications over time, so the OS seems like the right place for it.

  • + Share This
  • 🔖 Save To Your Account

InformIT Promotional Mailings & Special Offers

I would like to receive exclusive offers and hear about products from InformIT and its family of brands. I can unsubscribe at any time.

Overview


Pearson Education, Inc., 221 River Street, Hoboken, New Jersey 07030, (Pearson) presents this site to provide information about products and services that can be purchased through this site.

This privacy notice provides an overview of our commitment to privacy and describes how we collect, protect, use and share personal information collected through this site. Please note that other Pearson websites and online products and services have their own separate privacy policies.

Collection and Use of Information


To conduct business and deliver products and services, Pearson collects and uses personal information in several ways in connection with this site, including:

Questions and Inquiries

For inquiries and questions, we collect the inquiry or question, together with name, contact details (email address, phone number and mailing address) and any other additional information voluntarily submitted to us through a Contact Us form or an email. We use this information to address the inquiry and respond to the question.

Online Store

For orders and purchases placed through our online store on this site, we collect order details, name, institution name and address (if applicable), email address, phone number, shipping and billing addresses, credit/debit card information, shipping options and any instructions. We use this information to complete transactions, fulfill orders, communicate with individuals placing orders or visiting the online store, and for related purposes.

Surveys

Pearson may offer opportunities to provide feedback or participate in surveys, including surveys evaluating Pearson products, services or sites. Participation is voluntary. Pearson collects information requested in the survey questions and uses the information to evaluate, support, maintain and improve products, services or sites, develop new products and services, conduct educational research and for other purposes specified in the survey.

Contests and Drawings

Occasionally, we may sponsor a contest or drawing. Participation is optional. Pearson collects name, contact information and other information specified on the entry form for the contest or drawing to conduct the contest or drawing. Pearson may collect additional personal information from the winners of a contest or drawing in order to award the prize and for tax reporting purposes, as required by law.

Newsletters

If you have elected to receive email newsletters or promotional mailings and special offers but want to unsubscribe, simply email information@informit.com.

Service Announcements

On rare occasions it is necessary to send out a strictly service related announcement. For instance, if our service is temporarily suspended for maintenance we might send users an email. Generally, users may not opt-out of these communications, though they can deactivate their account information. However, these communications are not promotional in nature.

Customer Service

We communicate with users on a regular basis to provide requested services and in regard to issues relating to their account we reply via email or phone in accordance with the users' wishes when a user submits their information through our Contact Us form.

Other Collection and Use of Information


Application and System Logs

Pearson automatically collects log data to help ensure the delivery, availability and security of this site. Log data may include technical information about how a user or visitor connected to this site, such as browser type, type of computer/device, operating system, internet service provider and IP address. We use this information for support purposes and to monitor the health of the site, identify problems, improve service, detect unauthorized access and fraudulent activity, prevent and respond to security incidents and appropriately scale computing resources.

Web Analytics

Pearson may use third party web trend analytical services, including Google Analytics, to collect visitor information, such as IP addresses, browser types, referring pages, pages visited and time spent on a particular site. While these analytical services collect and report information on an anonymous basis, they may use cookies to gather web trend information. The information gathered may enable Pearson (but not the third party web trend services) to link information with application and system log data. Pearson uses this information for system administration and to identify problems, improve service, detect unauthorized access and fraudulent activity, prevent and respond to security incidents, appropriately scale computing resources and otherwise support and deliver this site and its services.

Cookies and Related Technologies

This site uses cookies and similar technologies to personalize content, measure traffic patterns, control security, track use and access of information on this site, and provide interest-based messages and advertising. Users can manage and block the use of cookies through their browser. Disabling or blocking certain cookies may limit the functionality of this site.

Do Not Track

This site currently does not respond to Do Not Track signals.

Security


Pearson uses appropriate physical, administrative and technical security measures to protect personal information from unauthorized access, use and disclosure.

Children


This site is not directed to children under the age of 13.

Marketing


Pearson may send or direct marketing communications to users, provided that

  • Pearson will not use personal information collected or processed as a K-12 school service provider for the purpose of directed or targeted advertising.
  • Such marketing is consistent with applicable law and Pearson's legal obligations.
  • Pearson will not knowingly direct or send marketing communications to an individual who has expressed a preference not to receive marketing.
  • Where required by applicable law, express or implied consent to marketing exists and has not been withdrawn.

Pearson may provide personal information to a third party service provider on a restricted basis to provide marketing solely on behalf of Pearson or an affiliate or customer for whom Pearson is a service provider. Marketing preferences may be changed at any time.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information


If a user's personally identifiable information changes (such as your postal address or email address), we provide a way to correct or update that user's personal data provided to us. This can be done on the Account page. If a user no longer desires our service and desires to delete his or her account, please contact us at customer-service@informit.com and we will process the deletion of a user's account.

Choice/Opt-out


Users can always make an informed choice as to whether they should proceed with certain services offered by InformIT. If you choose to remove yourself from our mailing list(s) simply visit the following page and uncheck any communication you no longer want to receive: www.informit.com/u.aspx.

Sale of Personal Information


Pearson does not rent or sell personal information in exchange for any payment of money.

While Pearson does not sell personal information, as defined in Nevada law, Nevada residents may email a request for no sale of their personal information to NevadaDesignatedRequest@pearson.com.

Supplemental Privacy Statement for California Residents


California residents should read our Supplemental privacy statement for California residents in conjunction with this Privacy Notice. The Supplemental privacy statement for California residents explains Pearson's commitment to comply with California law and applies to personal information of California residents collected in connection with this site and the Services.

Sharing and Disclosure


Pearson may disclose personal information, as follows:

  • As required by law.
  • With the consent of the individual (or their parent, if the individual is a minor)
  • In response to a subpoena, court order or legal process, to the extent permitted or required by law
  • To protect the security and safety of individuals, data, assets and systems, consistent with applicable law
  • In connection the sale, joint venture or other transfer of some or all of its company or assets, subject to the provisions of this Privacy Notice
  • To investigate or address actual or suspected fraud or other illegal activities
  • To exercise its legal rights, including enforcement of the Terms of Use for this site or another contract
  • To affiliated Pearson companies and other companies and organizations who perform work for Pearson and are obligated to protect the privacy of personal information consistent with this Privacy Notice
  • To a school, organization, company or government agency, where Pearson collects or processes the personal information in a school setting or on behalf of such organization, company or government agency.

Links


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that we are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of each and every web site that collects Personal Information. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this web site.

Requests and Contact


Please contact us about this Privacy Notice or if you have any requests or questions relating to the privacy of your personal information.

Changes to this Privacy Notice


We may revise this Privacy Notice through an updated posting. We will identify the effective date of the revision in the posting. Often, updates are made to provide greater clarity or to comply with changes in regulatory requirements. If the updates involve material changes to the collection, protection, use or disclosure of Personal Information, Pearson will provide notice of the change through a conspicuous notice on this site or other appropriate way. Continued use of the site after the effective date of a posted revision evidences acceptance. Please contact us if you have questions or concerns about the Privacy Notice or any objection to any revisions.

Last Update: November 17, 2020