Home > Articles > Programming > Windows Programming

A .NET Developer's Guide to Windows Security: Understanding Delegation

This chapter provides the ins and outs of delegation, the process by which a server impersonating a client attempts to use that client's credentials to access remote resources in Kerberos.
This chapter is from the book In Item 31, I described the concept of impersonation, where a server can temporarily take on a client's identity in order to perform some work on the client's behalf. Usually when a server impersonates a client, it's only to access resources that are local to the server. When the server attempts to use the client's credentials to access remote resources, well, that's delegation and by default it's disallowed. If a server (Bob) impersonates a remote client (Alice) and tries to authenticate with another server (Charlie), by default Charlie will see a null session (Item 35) rather than a logon for Alice.

Before Windows embraced Kerberos in Windows 2000, a simple challenge-response authentication protocol called NTLM was in place. Basically this said that to verify Alice's identity, Bob would challenge her by sending a unique number that she would then encrypt with a master key derived from her password. Bob would then send the challenge and Alice's response to a domain controller for verification. Bob didn't know Alice's password, and after this exchange he still didn't know her password. He therefore had no possible way to impersonate Alice on the network because, when Charlie challenged Bob to encrypt a number with Alice's password, Bob couldn't respond. The only way to make this work would be for Alice to tell Bob her password, and that would be very dangerous indeed because passwords are long-term secrets. There would be no practical constraint over Bob's use of Alice's password, either in space or in time. Bob could impersonate Alice to any server for months on end. This is why delegation simply was not supported in Windows NT 4 domains.

But along came Windows 2000 with Kerberos. If you read Item 59 (and I recommend that you do before you continue reading this item), you know that a Kerberos credential isn't the client's password. It's a temporary "ticket" plus a corresponding session key, and that ticket has a lifetime of a single workday. So in Windows 2000 you can flip a switch called "Trust this computer for delegation . . ." in Active Directory, and a server will suddenly be allowed to receive these types of delegated credentials. In fact, Active Directory even advertises this to clients: If Bob is a server account trusted for delegation, any tickets for Bob issued to clients contain a flag: ok-as-delegate.

Let's say you set up an IIS server on an intranet and configure it to use Integrated Windows Authentication (Kerberos). Let's say you also mark that computer account as "trusted for delegation" in Active Directory. When Alice points Internet Explorer to that Web server, during authentication the browser will see the ok-as-delegate flag and will check to see if Alice has a "forwardable" ticket (technically this is a ticket-granting ticket) for her domain authority. This will be the case only if Alice's account hasn't been marked "sensitive and cannot be delegated" in Active Directory. If she has a forwardable ticket, the browser will ask her domain authority for a "forwarded" ticket with a new session key and send that off to the Web server (the session key will be encrypted so an eavesdropper can't use it). The Web server can now use Alice's Kerberos credential (ticket plus session key) to obtain tickets to any other server on the network in her name. A Web programmer doesn't notice any of this magic happening. All he knows is that he can now impersonate his client (Alice) and access remote resources as her! Remember that tickets have a limited lifetime, and this delegated ticket will only be valid for ten hours from when Alice first logged in. So, in essence, Windows 2000 provides delegation that's constrained in time but not in space.

Let's back off of the mechanics for a minute and think about what this means. Before delegation, we had some serious limitations in how we could design multitier systems. Because the middle-tier server couldn't delegate the client's credentials to the back end, the back end had to trust the middle tier to perform any access checks that were necessary (see Figure 62.1). Think about it: No matter who the real client happened to be (Alice or somebody else), the back end always saw the middle tier's identity (Bob). This was one of the main motivations for Microsoft Transaction Server (MTS), which provided a framework for doing these access checks in the middle tier in Windows NT 4, before delegation was supported. That framework was called role-based security, and it still exists today in the successor to MTS, COM+.

62fig01.gifFigure 62.1 A three-tier system without and with delegation

With delegation, things look a bit different. Now the middle tier (Bob) can pass through the client's identity directly to the back end. Whereas the middle tier can still perform some role-based access checks, the back end has ultimate authority and can perform very fine-grained access control based on the original client's level of authorization.

There are pros and cons to either scenario. Without delegation, the middle tier can use pooled connections to access the back end. This is faster than warming up a connection for every client. But think about what happens if the middle tier is compromised! Because the middle tier uses its own credentials (Bob) to do work on behalf of all clients, an attacker who compromises it can do anything Bob can do with that back-end server. The attacker can run any stored procedure that Bob can run, can view any tables that Bob can view, and can make any changes that Bob is allowed to make. The back end trusts Bob, so if Bob falls to an attacker, the back end falls immediately as well.

With delegation, the middle tier (Bob) has very little privilege on the back end (possibly none at all), for the clients are the ones granted permissions to the back-end server. If the middle tier is compromised, the attacker has to wait for individual users to connect so he can impersonate them and use their credentials to attack the back end. But each individual user presumably has access only to a very small set of data on the back end. In this scenario, if the middle tier falls to an attacker, the back end is still quite insulated because it doesn't intrinsically trust the middle tier. One problem with this picture is that in Windows 2000 delegation isn't constrained in space. So if the middle tier is attached to servers other than the back end with which it's designed to work, the attacker might use clients' delegated credentials to attack these other servers. This problem is solved in Windows Server 2003, as you'll see. The other problem is that the middle tier can no longer use connection pooling to talk to the back end. You need a new connection for each user you impersonate. (Remember what a database connection is: It's an authenticated connection to the database!)

I happen to think using a mix of the two approaches in Figure 62.1 is your best bet. If you categorize interactions with the back end into low-privileged and high-privileged, you can allow the middle tier to perform all low-privileged interactions using Bob's credentials, making the best use of pooled connections. A high-privileged interaction requires the original client's credentials to be delegated to the back end. If the middle tier is compromised, the attacker has immediate access only to the interactions categorized as low-privileged. Damage is limited in the short term, and your detection countermeasures (Item 2) can kick in and notify the administrator that there's a problem. Not all systems can be built this way, but it's certainly a design worth considering.

Another thing to consider when delegating client credentials is that because the back end now grants permissions directly to clients as opposed to the middle tier, what's to stop the client from connecting directly to the back end instead of going through the middle tier? You probably don't want to allow this, but when talking to a traditional server like SQL Server, there's really no way to constrain this other than using conventional techniques such as firewalls. This is one place where I see Web services coming to the rescue. Because the Web service security specs are so flexible, there's no stopping the middle tier from passing two sets of credentials to a Web service back end: his own credentials (Bob) and those of his client (Alice). The back end can do a quick check to make sure Bob's credentials are valid and then use Alice's credentials to perform authorization. This prevents Alice from going directly to the back end, because she doesn't have Bob's credentials! I think it's an interesting idea to consider when building new systems.

Windows Server 2003 makes delegation more palatable by constraining it not only in time but also in space. I show the delegation options in a Windows Server 2003 domain in Figure 62.2. In Windows 2000 there were only two options for allowing an account to delegate client credentials:

  • Don't allow this account to delegate client credentials.

  • Allow this account to delegate client credentials to any server on the network.

62fig02.gifFigure 62.2 Constrained delegation in Windows Server 2003

Windows Server 2003 domains add a third option: Allow delegation to specified services only. This mitigates the problem of an attacker who has taken over the middle tier and wants to use delegated client credentials to attack servers that the middle tier wasn't even designed to talk to. With an extension to Kerberos, Windows Server 2003 domain authorities can now constrain delegating servers by restricting whom they can talk to using delegated credentials. In Figure 62.2, the middle-tier server is configured so that it can delegate client credentials, but only to SQL Server running on a machine called DATASERVER. This feature is known as "constrained delegation," and to learn more about how it works under the hood, see Brown (2003).

Delegation is an important security feature in Windows, one that requires virtually no programming (well, you have to impersonate to make it happen, but that's it). It's really a design issue, and one that should be considered early in the life cycle of an N-Tier project. Used carefully, delegation can help slow down an attack. Used carelessly, it can lead to middle-tier servers teeming with juicy client credentials that can be used to attack other network servers. See Item 64 to learn how to use delegation.

InformIT Promotional Mailings & Special Offers

I would like to receive exclusive offers and hear about products from InformIT and its family of brands. I can unsubscribe at any time.


Pearson Education, Inc., 221 River Street, Hoboken, New Jersey 07030, (Pearson) presents this site to provide information about products and services that can be purchased through this site.

This privacy notice provides an overview of our commitment to privacy and describes how we collect, protect, use and share personal information collected through this site. Please note that other Pearson websites and online products and services have their own separate privacy policies.

Collection and Use of Information

To conduct business and deliver products and services, Pearson collects and uses personal information in several ways in connection with this site, including:

Questions and Inquiries

For inquiries and questions, we collect the inquiry or question, together with name, contact details (email address, phone number and mailing address) and any other additional information voluntarily submitted to us through a Contact Us form or an email. We use this information to address the inquiry and respond to the question.

Online Store

For orders and purchases placed through our online store on this site, we collect order details, name, institution name and address (if applicable), email address, phone number, shipping and billing addresses, credit/debit card information, shipping options and any instructions. We use this information to complete transactions, fulfill orders, communicate with individuals placing orders or visiting the online store, and for related purposes.


Pearson may offer opportunities to provide feedback or participate in surveys, including surveys evaluating Pearson products, services or sites. Participation is voluntary. Pearson collects information requested in the survey questions and uses the information to evaluate, support, maintain and improve products, services or sites, develop new products and services, conduct educational research and for other purposes specified in the survey.

Contests and Drawings

Occasionally, we may sponsor a contest or drawing. Participation is optional. Pearson collects name, contact information and other information specified on the entry form for the contest or drawing to conduct the contest or drawing. Pearson may collect additional personal information from the winners of a contest or drawing in order to award the prize and for tax reporting purposes, as required by law.


If you have elected to receive email newsletters or promotional mailings and special offers but want to unsubscribe, simply email information@informit.com.

Service Announcements

On rare occasions it is necessary to send out a strictly service related announcement. For instance, if our service is temporarily suspended for maintenance we might send users an email. Generally, users may not opt-out of these communications, though they can deactivate their account information. However, these communications are not promotional in nature.

Customer Service

We communicate with users on a regular basis to provide requested services and in regard to issues relating to their account we reply via email or phone in accordance with the users' wishes when a user submits their information through our Contact Us form.

Other Collection and Use of Information

Application and System Logs

Pearson automatically collects log data to help ensure the delivery, availability and security of this site. Log data may include technical information about how a user or visitor connected to this site, such as browser type, type of computer/device, operating system, internet service provider and IP address. We use this information for support purposes and to monitor the health of the site, identify problems, improve service, detect unauthorized access and fraudulent activity, prevent and respond to security incidents and appropriately scale computing resources.

Web Analytics

Pearson may use third party web trend analytical services, including Google Analytics, to collect visitor information, such as IP addresses, browser types, referring pages, pages visited and time spent on a particular site. While these analytical services collect and report information on an anonymous basis, they may use cookies to gather web trend information. The information gathered may enable Pearson (but not the third party web trend services) to link information with application and system log data. Pearson uses this information for system administration and to identify problems, improve service, detect unauthorized access and fraudulent activity, prevent and respond to security incidents, appropriately scale computing resources and otherwise support and deliver this site and its services.

Cookies and Related Technologies

This site uses cookies and similar technologies to personalize content, measure traffic patterns, control security, track use and access of information on this site, and provide interest-based messages and advertising. Users can manage and block the use of cookies through their browser. Disabling or blocking certain cookies may limit the functionality of this site.

Do Not Track

This site currently does not respond to Do Not Track signals.


Pearson uses appropriate physical, administrative and technical security measures to protect personal information from unauthorized access, use and disclosure.


This site is not directed to children under the age of 13.


Pearson may send or direct marketing communications to users, provided that

  • Pearson will not use personal information collected or processed as a K-12 school service provider for the purpose of directed or targeted advertising.
  • Such marketing is consistent with applicable law and Pearson's legal obligations.
  • Pearson will not knowingly direct or send marketing communications to an individual who has expressed a preference not to receive marketing.
  • Where required by applicable law, express or implied consent to marketing exists and has not been withdrawn.

Pearson may provide personal information to a third party service provider on a restricted basis to provide marketing solely on behalf of Pearson or an affiliate or customer for whom Pearson is a service provider. Marketing preferences may be changed at any time.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user's personally identifiable information changes (such as your postal address or email address), we provide a way to correct or update that user's personal data provided to us. This can be done on the Account page. If a user no longer desires our service and desires to delete his or her account, please contact us at customer-service@informit.com and we will process the deletion of a user's account.


Users can always make an informed choice as to whether they should proceed with certain services offered by InformIT. If you choose to remove yourself from our mailing list(s) simply visit the following page and uncheck any communication you no longer want to receive: www.informit.com/u.aspx.

Sale of Personal Information

Pearson does not rent or sell personal information in exchange for any payment of money.

While Pearson does not sell personal information, as defined in Nevada law, Nevada residents may email a request for no sale of their personal information to NevadaDesignatedRequest@pearson.com.

Supplemental Privacy Statement for California Residents

California residents should read our Supplemental privacy statement for California residents in conjunction with this Privacy Notice. The Supplemental privacy statement for California residents explains Pearson's commitment to comply with California law and applies to personal information of California residents collected in connection with this site and the Services.

Sharing and Disclosure

Pearson may disclose personal information, as follows:

  • As required by law.
  • With the consent of the individual (or their parent, if the individual is a minor)
  • In response to a subpoena, court order or legal process, to the extent permitted or required by law
  • To protect the security and safety of individuals, data, assets and systems, consistent with applicable law
  • In connection the sale, joint venture or other transfer of some or all of its company or assets, subject to the provisions of this Privacy Notice
  • To investigate or address actual or suspected fraud or other illegal activities
  • To exercise its legal rights, including enforcement of the Terms of Use for this site or another contract
  • To affiliated Pearson companies and other companies and organizations who perform work for Pearson and are obligated to protect the privacy of personal information consistent with this Privacy Notice
  • To a school, organization, company or government agency, where Pearson collects or processes the personal information in a school setting or on behalf of such organization, company or government agency.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that we are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of each and every web site that collects Personal Information. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this web site.

Requests and Contact

Please contact us about this Privacy Notice or if you have any requests or questions relating to the privacy of your personal information.

Changes to this Privacy Notice

We may revise this Privacy Notice through an updated posting. We will identify the effective date of the revision in the posting. Often, updates are made to provide greater clarity or to comply with changes in regulatory requirements. If the updates involve material changes to the collection, protection, use or disclosure of Personal Information, Pearson will provide notice of the change through a conspicuous notice on this site or other appropriate way. Continued use of the site after the effective date of a posted revision evidences acceptance. Please contact us if you have questions or concerns about the Privacy Notice or any objection to any revisions.

Last Update: November 17, 2020