Home > Articles > Software Development & Management > Agile

Lean-Agile Acceptance Test-Driven Development: An Interview with Ken Pugh

  • Print
  • + Share This
How does testing fit into an agile organization? Can you have both? And what does that look like? Matt Heusser interviewed Ken Pugh, author of Lean Agile Acceptance Test Driven Development, to find out.
Like this article? We recommend

There are a handful of books coming out on Acceptance Test Driven Development (ATDD). Yet the topic is so new, and there have been very few long-term sustained results. How could anyone possibly be qualified to write about the subject?

It turns out ATDD might not be as new as you thought. Bertrand Meyer coined the term "design by contract" in 1986. And while he might not have been using the right magic words, consultant Ken Pugh has been incorporating the principles and values of ATDD as part of his continual improvements in his programming practice since he started programming in the 1960's.

It turns out that Ken wrote his first program in 1967. He worked as an electrical engineer and programmer before starting his own consulting business that did custom programming and consulting. In that time, he explored lots of methods and methodologies by doing them and experimenting. Since the turn of the millennium, he spends his time helping organizations while observing what is working for them ... and what is not.

Basing his book on years of experience, we thought InformIT readers might be interested on the backstory of the book: How Ken got involved with the intersection of lean and agile, what it looks like, how it's different from some of those older ideas—and just what exactly he means by this mythical term "ATDD."

Matt Heusser: Thank you for finding time for this interview, Ken. Let's start with Agile. Can you give us the five-minute talk on how testers can adjust to agile? I know, for example, that lots of organizations revert to a mini-waterfall, crunching the "testing" into the end and "blowing" iteration deadlines. How can agile teams get around that problem?

Ken Pugh: The answer is not to create a testing story for every development story. That way developers can be “done” with their story, while the testing story gets put off till the next iteration. A better answer is to separate out the authoring of a test from the execution of that test. If the authoring is done prior to implementation being finished, then the developer can execute the test to determine if he or she is done. This is a switch for the mindset of the entire team—developers doing testing, testers creating tests that do not emphasize the GUI, but the functionality. And it will take effort to make the switch, since testers will need time to catch up and reverse the sequence.

There will still be testing after a story is deemed done, such as usability and performance. And results from those tests may involve creating new stories.

Having tests first eliminates a lot of delay and looping. With tests last, there is a delay between developers finishing coding and testers testing it. When testers find defects, the issue has to loop back to the developer. Getting rid of delays follows lean principles.

Matt: So let's talk a little bit about Lean. What is it, and how did you start finding out about it?

Ken: I first discovered lean software development when I met Mary and Tom Poppendieck at a consultants' conference in Newport, Oregon. Part of the reason I joined Net Objectives was their emphasis on lean consulting.

Lean has seven principles which are nicely described in Mary and Tom’s books, so I won’t repeat them here. One major emphasis is eliminating waste and delivering quickly. You examine the value stream—the process by which you turn ideas into deliverables. Then you cut out delays. For example, putting the authoring of tests first eliminates delays.

Matt: So we have lean over here and agile over there. How do they work together? What does lean-agile testing look like?

Ken: One of the agile principles is that “working software is the primary measure of progress.” How do you know it works? It at least has to pass the tests. Getting the tests done without delay is the lean part.

Matt: Your book is not just on lean-agile testing—it is specifically on lean-agile Acceptance Test Driven Development (ATDD). That's quite a mouthful. Can you give us the five-minute overview of ATDD?

Ken: The first thing is that ATDD is not just about testing. It’s about communicating the requirements. And it’s not just for testers. It’s for the entire team—the customer, developer, and tester units. I refer to this group as the triad. Requirements and tests go together. You can’t have one without the other. Acceptance tests clarify the requirements and provide a check on when the requirement has been implemented. The triad collaborates at each phase in the process—the initial creation of features, the breakdown into stories, and the development of scenarios. When features are initially created, acceptance criteria should be associated with them. These are general plans for how the feature will be tested. When the stories are created, more specific acceptance criteria are developed for them. Finally, when specific scenarios are established, then acceptance tests are created. A story is not done until the acceptance tests pass for all scenarios. They provide the doneness measure for the story. If an acceptance test is created for a story after the story is declared done, then the test really represents a new requirement.

Matt: So to these acceptance tests have to be automated?

Ken: I suggest a stepped approach. First, you create the tests themselves to make sure that the requirement is well understood. Then you decide what you are going to automate and what framework to use—an acceptance test one such as FitNesse or a unit one, such as JUnit. Depending on the framework and how you structure the tests, the costs of automation can be relatively low. If you automate the tests, they can be used as regression tests to ensure that changes to the system do not cause unwanted effects. There may be some tests, particularly those involving the GUI, that don’t justify the cost since GUI-based tests tend to be fragile. If you automate the tests in a framework that relates them to the requirement, then you have what many call an executable specification. This specification not only describes what a system does, but provides the tests that demonstrate that the implementation actually does that.

Matt: Let's say we do choose to automate the tests—say it's a web-based application. Should we automate the driving of the GUI, the actual browser itself, or "just" test the business logic behind the GUI? It seems that you lean towards "no," but what kind of factors should we consider when making that decision?

Ken: Automating just beneath the GUI is usually the most effective place. The tests will run faster than GUI-based tests; in many cases, much faster. They can help drive the application to be more testable by requiring test-points that can be accessed for testing. If the GUI uses callbacks to the server, just as Ajax, the results of those calls can be tested. If you can run tests for business rules at this level, then the business rules may be kept out of the GUI.

Automated GUI-based tests can be fragile. They can also be lengthy. An example that I give in my book and repeat on the web shows how checking that the proper discount is given for an order can require many more test steps if performed using the GUI than if done at a lower level. You still need to do GUI tests in order to ensure that it is properly connected to the layer beneath. They just won’t be as extensive.

Matt: Tell us more about these acceptance tests. Experts disagree on the "right" number of tests (Pettichord, Pg 27), so how can we know when we have "enough" acceptance tests?

Ken: Acceptance tests are about understanding the requirement and its scenarios. If a test does not pass, then a customer requirement has not been met. They are necessary, but not sufficient. They emphasize what has to go right.

Tests are described in business domain terms. For example, you might have a speed in miles per hour or an email address. They are not described in programming terms, as an int or a string. If you use corresponding objects in the implementation, then those objects can check whether the speed is non-negative or the email address is in a valid format. Other tests should not have to check whether values of those types are valid. A test would only specify that an input should be an email address or a speed. This cuts down on the number of tests from an acceptance point of view.

Exploratory testing, which is manual, involves testing from a different perspective–concurrent test design and execution. It needs to be a part of the development process to catch issues which the acceptance tests do not. Part of the emphasis in exploratory testing is on what can go wrong. For the examples of speed and email address, you might enter many possibilities in a GUI field to see if there are any side effects caused by the GUI.

Matt: Can you tell us a bit about how these automated tests fit into the whole spectrum of software tests—unit tests, exploratory testing, attribute testing—things like security and scalability testing?

Ken: On one side of the spectrum are tests that can be created prior to implementation. For example, a scenario test can provide values that are used by the unit tests. Acceptance tests are created prior to implementation and are implementation independent. Unit tests are created during implementation and are tightly implementation dependent. Acceptance tests are tests for the business intent of a system. Unit tests drive the underlying design of the code. Acceptance tests can form a context for the unit tests. Unit tests are definitely automated; acceptance tests usually are automated.

On the other side of the spectrum are the tests that cannot be done until some implementation has been developed. Some attributes such as performance can be tested automatically with tools. Exploratory testing, as already described, is manual. Usability testing requires a human. You can’t ask a computer whether a GUI is usable.

Matt: Thank you for participating. Where can we go for more?

Ken: I’m adding more information to my website on the subject: http://www.atdd.biz. You can also write me at ken.pugh@netobjectives.com

  • + Share This
  • 🔖 Save To Your Account

InformIT Promotional Mailings & Special Offers

I would like to receive exclusive offers and hear about products from InformIT and its family of brands. I can unsubscribe at any time.

Overview


Pearson Education, Inc., 221 River Street, Hoboken, New Jersey 07030, (Pearson) presents this site to provide information about products and services that can be purchased through this site.

This privacy notice provides an overview of our commitment to privacy and describes how we collect, protect, use and share personal information collected through this site. Please note that other Pearson websites and online products and services have their own separate privacy policies.

Collection and Use of Information


To conduct business and deliver products and services, Pearson collects and uses personal information in several ways in connection with this site, including:

Questions and Inquiries

For inquiries and questions, we collect the inquiry or question, together with name, contact details (email address, phone number and mailing address) and any other additional information voluntarily submitted to us through a Contact Us form or an email. We use this information to address the inquiry and respond to the question.

Online Store

For orders and purchases placed through our online store on this site, we collect order details, name, institution name and address (if applicable), email address, phone number, shipping and billing addresses, credit/debit card information, shipping options and any instructions. We use this information to complete transactions, fulfill orders, communicate with individuals placing orders or visiting the online store, and for related purposes.

Surveys

Pearson may offer opportunities to provide feedback or participate in surveys, including surveys evaluating Pearson products, services or sites. Participation is voluntary. Pearson collects information requested in the survey questions and uses the information to evaluate, support, maintain and improve products, services or sites, develop new products and services, conduct educational research and for other purposes specified in the survey.

Contests and Drawings

Occasionally, we may sponsor a contest or drawing. Participation is optional. Pearson collects name, contact information and other information specified on the entry form for the contest or drawing to conduct the contest or drawing. Pearson may collect additional personal information from the winners of a contest or drawing in order to award the prize and for tax reporting purposes, as required by law.

Newsletters

If you have elected to receive email newsletters or promotional mailings and special offers but want to unsubscribe, simply email information@informit.com.

Service Announcements

On rare occasions it is necessary to send out a strictly service related announcement. For instance, if our service is temporarily suspended for maintenance we might send users an email. Generally, users may not opt-out of these communications, though they can deactivate their account information. However, these communications are not promotional in nature.

Customer Service

We communicate with users on a regular basis to provide requested services and in regard to issues relating to their account we reply via email or phone in accordance with the users' wishes when a user submits their information through our Contact Us form.

Other Collection and Use of Information


Application and System Logs

Pearson automatically collects log data to help ensure the delivery, availability and security of this site. Log data may include technical information about how a user or visitor connected to this site, such as browser type, type of computer/device, operating system, internet service provider and IP address. We use this information for support purposes and to monitor the health of the site, identify problems, improve service, detect unauthorized access and fraudulent activity, prevent and respond to security incidents and appropriately scale computing resources.

Web Analytics

Pearson may use third party web trend analytical services, including Google Analytics, to collect visitor information, such as IP addresses, browser types, referring pages, pages visited and time spent on a particular site. While these analytical services collect and report information on an anonymous basis, they may use cookies to gather web trend information. The information gathered may enable Pearson (but not the third party web trend services) to link information with application and system log data. Pearson uses this information for system administration and to identify problems, improve service, detect unauthorized access and fraudulent activity, prevent and respond to security incidents, appropriately scale computing resources and otherwise support and deliver this site and its services.

Cookies and Related Technologies

This site uses cookies and similar technologies to personalize content, measure traffic patterns, control security, track use and access of information on this site, and provide interest-based messages and advertising. Users can manage and block the use of cookies through their browser. Disabling or blocking certain cookies may limit the functionality of this site.

Do Not Track

This site currently does not respond to Do Not Track signals.

Security


Pearson uses appropriate physical, administrative and technical security measures to protect personal information from unauthorized access, use and disclosure.

Children


This site is not directed to children under the age of 13.

Marketing


Pearson may send or direct marketing communications to users, provided that

  • Pearson will not use personal information collected or processed as a K-12 school service provider for the purpose of directed or targeted advertising.
  • Such marketing is consistent with applicable law and Pearson's legal obligations.
  • Pearson will not knowingly direct or send marketing communications to an individual who has expressed a preference not to receive marketing.
  • Where required by applicable law, express or implied consent to marketing exists and has not been withdrawn.

Pearson may provide personal information to a third party service provider on a restricted basis to provide marketing solely on behalf of Pearson or an affiliate or customer for whom Pearson is a service provider. Marketing preferences may be changed at any time.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information


If a user's personally identifiable information changes (such as your postal address or email address), we provide a way to correct or update that user's personal data provided to us. This can be done on the Account page. If a user no longer desires our service and desires to delete his or her account, please contact us at customer-service@informit.com and we will process the deletion of a user's account.

Choice/Opt-out


Users can always make an informed choice as to whether they should proceed with certain services offered by InformIT. If you choose to remove yourself from our mailing list(s) simply visit the following page and uncheck any communication you no longer want to receive: www.informit.com/u.aspx.

Sale of Personal Information


Pearson does not rent or sell personal information in exchange for any payment of money.

While Pearson does not sell personal information, as defined in Nevada law, Nevada residents may email a request for no sale of their personal information to NevadaDesignatedRequest@pearson.com.

Supplemental Privacy Statement for California Residents


California residents should read our Supplemental privacy statement for California residents in conjunction with this Privacy Notice. The Supplemental privacy statement for California residents explains Pearson's commitment to comply with California law and applies to personal information of California residents collected in connection with this site and the Services.

Sharing and Disclosure


Pearson may disclose personal information, as follows:

  • As required by law.
  • With the consent of the individual (or their parent, if the individual is a minor)
  • In response to a subpoena, court order or legal process, to the extent permitted or required by law
  • To protect the security and safety of individuals, data, assets and systems, consistent with applicable law
  • In connection the sale, joint venture or other transfer of some or all of its company or assets, subject to the provisions of this Privacy Notice
  • To investigate or address actual or suspected fraud or other illegal activities
  • To exercise its legal rights, including enforcement of the Terms of Use for this site or another contract
  • To affiliated Pearson companies and other companies and organizations who perform work for Pearson and are obligated to protect the privacy of personal information consistent with this Privacy Notice
  • To a school, organization, company or government agency, where Pearson collects or processes the personal information in a school setting or on behalf of such organization, company or government agency.

Links


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that we are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of each and every web site that collects Personal Information. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this web site.

Requests and Contact


Please contact us about this Privacy Notice or if you have any requests or questions relating to the privacy of your personal information.

Changes to this Privacy Notice


We may revise this Privacy Notice through an updated posting. We will identify the effective date of the revision in the posting. Often, updates are made to provide greater clarity or to comply with changes in regulatory requirements. If the updates involve material changes to the collection, protection, use or disclosure of Personal Information, Pearson will provide notice of the change through a conspicuous notice on this site or other appropriate way. Continued use of the site after the effective date of a posted revision evidences acceptance. Please contact us if you have questions or concerns about the Privacy Notice or any objection to any revisions.

Last Update: November 17, 2020