Home > Articles

The Commercialization of Personal Data

  • Print
  • + Share This
Who owns your online privacy and how.
This chapter is from the book

What Kind of Vegetable Are You?

It didn’t raise eyebrows when Aleksandr Kogan offered “This is Your Digital Life” as a Facebook quiz app. Quiz apps are a staple of Facebook marketing, enticing users to participate and then harvesting marketing data. These apps—which are enticing, seductive, and highly effective—have spawned an entire subindustry of quiz-marketing tools and specialists.

About 270,000 Facebook users installed Kogan’s app and took its personality test, in the process giving the app access to their contacts to invite them to follow suit. Kogan’s ostensible motivation was academic research—studying how emojis are used to convey emotion. But what he did with all the data he collected was quite different. Through Kogan’s app, the firm Cambridge Analytica harvested data on more than 50 million people. Cambridge Analytica used that information to help presidential candidate Donald Trump’s campaign target audiences for digital advertising and fundraising, model voter turnout, identify markets to air television ads, and even plan Trump’s travel. Cambridge Analytica asserted that its “psychographic profiles” helped to identify likely voters and the kinds of messages that would sway them to vote Trump.1

But how did a quarter million people downloading an app turn into data spillage from 50 million? Through the porous privacy model of Facebook apps. Each of the 270,000 users who installed the app was connected to an average of 200 friends. “This is Your Digital Life” based its assessment not so much on the quiz as on the history of pages “liked.” The quiz was a pretext to obtain access to users’ likes and those of their contacts. Facebook permitted that data shoveling in 2015—although it says Kogan violated the program’s terms by sharing profile data with Cambridge Analytica.

Your privacy is not your own. Even if you rejected “This is Your Digital Life,” any of your friends—or the apps they installed—could have compromised your data. This has parallels in the non-digital world as well, of course. (Consider the old saying “Two people can keep a secret if one of them is dead.”) But offline, you may have better intuitions about it. You know not to share a story with the gossipy neighbor until you’re ready to be asked questions by strangers in the supermarket. Online, it took a long time for Facebook’s privacy settings to gain simple audience controls, and not until after the Cambridge Analytica scandal did the social network stop allowing apps to traverse the social graph, slurping up the network of friend connections.

Leave Me Alone

More than a century ago, two lawyers raised the alarm about the impact technology and the media were having on personal privacy:

  • Instantaneous photographs and newspaper enterprise have invaded the sacred precincts of private and domestic life; and numerous mechanical devices threaten to make good the prediction that “what is whispered in the closet shall be proclaimed from the house-tops.”

This statement is from the seminal Harvard Law Review article on privacy published in 1890 by Boston attorney Samuel Warren and his law partner, Louis Brandeis, later to be a justice of the U.S. Supreme Court (where, as we saw, he dissented in defense of privacy in Olmstead v. U.S.).2 Warren and Brandeis went on to say,

  • Gossip is no longer the resource of the idle and of the vicious, but has become a trade, which is pursued with industry as well as effrontery. To satisfy a prurient taste the details of sexual relations are spread broadcast in the columns of the daily papers. To occupy the indolent, column upon column is filled with idle gossip, which can only be procured by intrusion upon the domestic circle.

New technologies made this garbage easy to produce, and then the supply created the demand. And those candid photographs and gossip columns were not merely tasteless; they were bad. Sounding like modern critics of mindless reality TV, Warren and Brandeis raged that society was going to hell in a handbasket because of all that stuff that was being spread about:

  • Even gossip apparently harmless, when widely and persistently circulated, is potent for evil. It both belittles and perverts. It belittles by inverting the relative importance of things, thus dwarfing the thoughts and aspirations of a people. When personal gossip attains the dignity of print, and crowds the space available for matters of real interest to the community, what wonder that the ignorant and thoughtless mistake its relative importance. Easy of comprehension, appealing to that weak side of human nature which is never wholly cast down by the misfortunes and frailties of our neighbors, no one can be surprised that it usurps the place of interest in brains capable of other things. Triviality destroys at once robustness of thought and delicacy of feeling. No enthusiasm can flourish, no generous impulse can survive under its blighting influence.

The problem Warren and Brandeis perceived was that it was hard to say just why such invasions of privacy should be unlawful. In individual cases, you could say something sensible, but the individual legal decisions were not part of a general regime. The courts had certainly applied legal sanctions for defamation—publishing malicious gossip that was false—but then what about malicious gossip that was true? Other courts had imposed penalties for publishing an individual’s private letters—but on the basis of property law, just as though the individual’s horse had been stolen rather than the words in his letters. That did not seem to be the right analogy either. No, they concluded, such rationales didn’t get to the nub. When something private is published about you, something has been taken from you, you are a victim of theft—but the thing stolen from you is part of your identity as a person. In fact, privacy was a right, they said, a “general right of the individual to be let alone.” That right had long been in the background of court decisions, but the new technologies had brought this matter to a head. In articulating this new right, Warren and Brandeis were, they asserted, grounding it in the principle of “inviolate personhood,” the sanctity of individual identity.

Privacy and Freedom

The Warren–Brandeis articulation of privacy as a right to be left alone was influential, but it was never really complete. Throughout the twentieth century, there were simply too many good reasons for not leaving people alone, and there were too many ways in which people preferred not to be left alone. And in the United States, First Amendment rights stood in tension with privacy rights. As a general rule, the government cannot stop me from saying anything truthful. In particular, it usually cannot stop me from saying what I lawfully discover about your private affairs. Yet the Warren–Brandeis definition worked well enough for a long time because, as Robert Fano put it, “The pace of technological progress was for a long time sufficiently slow as to enable society to learn pragmatically how to exploit new technology and prevent its abuse, with society maintaining its equilibrium most of the time.”3 By the late 1950s, the emerging electronic technologies, both computers and communication, had destroyed that balance. Society could no longer adjust pragmatically because surveillance technologies were developing too quickly.

The result was a landmark study of privacy by the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, which culminated in the publication, in 1967, of a book by Alan Westin, titled Privacy and Freedom.4 (Fano was reviewing Westin’s book when he painted the picture of social disequilibrium caused by rapid technological change.) Westin proposed a crucial shift of focus.

Brandeis and Warren had seen a loss of privacy as a form of personal injury, which might be so severe as to cause “mental pain and distress, far greater than could be inflicted by mere bodily injury.” Individuals had to take responsibility for protecting themselves. “Each man is responsible for his own acts and omissions only.” But the law had to provide the weapons with which to resist invasions of privacy.

Westin recognized that the Brandeis–Warren formulation was too absolute, in the face of the speech rights of other individuals and society’s legitimate data-gathering practices. Protection might come not from protective shields but from control over the uses to which personal information could be put. “Privacy,” wrote Westin, “is the claim of individuals, groups, or institutions to determine for themselves when, how, and to what extent information about them is communicated to others.” Westin proposed:

  • …what is needed is a structured and rational weighing process, with definite criteria that public and private authorities can apply in comparing the claim for disclosure or surveillance through new devices with the claim to privacy. The following are suggested as the basic steps of such a process: measuring the seriousness of the need to conduct surveillance; deciding whether there are alternative methods to meet the need; deciding what degree of reliability will be required of the surveillance instrument; determining whether true consent to surveillance has been given; and measuring the capacity for limitation and control of the surveillance if it is allowed.5

So even if there were a legitimate reason why the government, or some other party, might know something about you, your right to privacy might limit what the knowing party could do with that information.

This more nuanced understanding of privacy emerged from the important social roles that privacy plays. Privacy is not, as Warren and Brandeis had it, the right to be isolated from society; privacy is a right that makes society work.

Fano mentioned three social roles of privacy. First, “the right to maintain the privacy of one’s personality can be regarded as part of the right of self-preservation”—the right to keep your adolescent misjudgments and personal conflicts to yourself, as long as they are of no lasting significance to your ultimate position in society. Second, privacy is the way society allows deviations from prevailing social norms, given that no one set of social norms is universally and permanently satisfactory—and, indeed, given that social progress requires social experimentation. And third, privacy is essential to the development of independent thought; it enables some decoupling of the individual from society so that thoughts can be shared in limited circles and rehearsed before public exposure.

Philosopher Helen Nissenbaum similarly grounds privacy in social being, describing privacy as “contextual integrity.”6 Privacy depends on a match between data flows and the expectations and norms of the setting in which information was generated and shared. When Facebook invites you to friend your therapist or a fellow patient, that’s a context violation. Online spaces offer the opportunity to multiply contexts: You can be one persona on your Instagram feed and another in the classroom. But online spaces also threaten context collapse, as Stacy Snyder found way back in the days of Myspace, when her photograph captioned “drunken pirate” on what she thought was a merely social post cost her a teaching degree.7

The explosive growth in digital technologies has radically altered our expectations about what will be private and shifted our thinking about what should be private. It has made privacy violations easier and potentially more numerous. Indeed, it is remarkable that we no longer blink at intrusions that a decade ago would have seemed shocking. Unlike with the story of secrecy, there was no single technological event that caused the change, no privacy-shattering breakthrough—only a steady advance on several technological fronts that ultimately passed a tipping point.

Sensor devices got cheaper, better, and smaller. Tiny cameras, GPS units, and microphones have gone from the stuff of spy museums to the banality of everyday carry. Once they became useful consumer goods, we seemingly worried less about their uses as surveillance devices. Instead of trying to come up with a unifying theory of privacy and its value, we find ourselves piecing together privacy from feelings of discomfort and regret amid the abundance. It’s that much harder when we’re the ones bringing spies into our own homes and those of our friends, when we trade privacy against conviviality and convenience.

Smile While We Snap!

Big Brother had his legions of cameras, and the City of London has theirs today. But for sheer photographic pervasiveness, nothing beats the cameras in the cell phones in the hands of everyday people. Flying out before the Fourth of July, Helen was asked to switch seats with another woman who wanted to be seated with her boyfriend. She took her seat a row up and struck up a conversation with her new seatmate, unaware that the row behind was filming them as romance. The pair she had helped were tweeting the flight, hashtagged #PlaneBae, and the story soon made the rounds of television morning shows. Innocent fun, it might seem, but not for Helen, who stated (through lawyers),

  • Without my knowledge or consent, other passengers photographed me and recorded my conversation with a seatmate. They posted images and recordings to social media, and speculated unfairly about my private conduct.

  • Since then, my personal information has been widely distributed online. Strangers publicly discussed my private life based on patently false information.

  • I have been doxxed, shamed, insulted and harassed. Voyeurs have come looking for me online and in the real world.8

The massive dissemination of cheap cameras coupled with universal access to the Web enables a kind of vigilante justice—a ubiquitous Little-Brotherism, in which we can all be detectives, judges, and corrections officers. Bloggers can bring global attention to ordinary citizens.

For every lens aimed deliberately, there are also scores more watching unattended: public and private observation and surveillance. Main Street is lined with security cameras peeping from store windows and police surveillance cameras, some of which even offer public viewing. Leafy Lane may be watching, too, thanks to networks of Ring doorbells and vigilant neighbors in Nextdoor groups. Coupled with automated facial recognition, the wired streets could be building dossiers on us all.

Looking at images on the Web is now a leisure activity that anyone can do at any time, anywhere in the world. Using Google Street View, you can sit in a café in Tajikistan and identify a car that was parked in my driveway when Google’s camera came by (perhaps months ago). From Seoul, you can see what’s happening right now, updated every few seconds, in Piccadilly Circus or on the strip in Las Vegas. These views were always available to the public, but cameras plus the Web change the meaning of “public.”

Some of the intrusions into our privacy come because of the unexpected, unseen side effects of things we do quite voluntarily. While the Fourth Amendment protects us from overreach of government surveillance, there is only patchwork legal consideration of private information gathering in the United States. Companies routinely gather and infer information about individuals and use it to customize product offerings and advertisements. As the saying goes, if you’re not paying, you’re the product.

  • + Share This
  • 🔖 Save To Your Account

InformIT Promotional Mailings & Special Offers

I would like to receive exclusive offers and hear about products from InformIT and its family of brands. I can unsubscribe at any time.

Overview


Pearson Education, Inc., 221 River Street, Hoboken, New Jersey 07030, (Pearson) presents this site to provide information about products and services that can be purchased through this site.

This privacy notice provides an overview of our commitment to privacy and describes how we collect, protect, use and share personal information collected through this site. Please note that other Pearson websites and online products and services have their own separate privacy policies.

Collection and Use of Information


To conduct business and deliver products and services, Pearson collects and uses personal information in several ways in connection with this site, including:

Questions and Inquiries

For inquiries and questions, we collect the inquiry or question, together with name, contact details (email address, phone number and mailing address) and any other additional information voluntarily submitted to us through a Contact Us form or an email. We use this information to address the inquiry and respond to the question.

Online Store

For orders and purchases placed through our online store on this site, we collect order details, name, institution name and address (if applicable), email address, phone number, shipping and billing addresses, credit/debit card information, shipping options and any instructions. We use this information to complete transactions, fulfill orders, communicate with individuals placing orders or visiting the online store, and for related purposes.

Surveys

Pearson may offer opportunities to provide feedback or participate in surveys, including surveys evaluating Pearson products, services or sites. Participation is voluntary. Pearson collects information requested in the survey questions and uses the information to evaluate, support, maintain and improve products, services or sites, develop new products and services, conduct educational research and for other purposes specified in the survey.

Contests and Drawings

Occasionally, we may sponsor a contest or drawing. Participation is optional. Pearson collects name, contact information and other information specified on the entry form for the contest or drawing to conduct the contest or drawing. Pearson may collect additional personal information from the winners of a contest or drawing in order to award the prize and for tax reporting purposes, as required by law.

Newsletters

If you have elected to receive email newsletters or promotional mailings and special offers but want to unsubscribe, simply email information@informit.com.

Service Announcements

On rare occasions it is necessary to send out a strictly service related announcement. For instance, if our service is temporarily suspended for maintenance we might send users an email. Generally, users may not opt-out of these communications, though they can deactivate their account information. However, these communications are not promotional in nature.

Customer Service

We communicate with users on a regular basis to provide requested services and in regard to issues relating to their account we reply via email or phone in accordance with the users' wishes when a user submits their information through our Contact Us form.

Other Collection and Use of Information


Application and System Logs

Pearson automatically collects log data to help ensure the delivery, availability and security of this site. Log data may include technical information about how a user or visitor connected to this site, such as browser type, type of computer/device, operating system, internet service provider and IP address. We use this information for support purposes and to monitor the health of the site, identify problems, improve service, detect unauthorized access and fraudulent activity, prevent and respond to security incidents and appropriately scale computing resources.

Web Analytics

Pearson may use third party web trend analytical services, including Google Analytics, to collect visitor information, such as IP addresses, browser types, referring pages, pages visited and time spent on a particular site. While these analytical services collect and report information on an anonymous basis, they may use cookies to gather web trend information. The information gathered may enable Pearson (but not the third party web trend services) to link information with application and system log data. Pearson uses this information for system administration and to identify problems, improve service, detect unauthorized access and fraudulent activity, prevent and respond to security incidents, appropriately scale computing resources and otherwise support and deliver this site and its services.

Cookies and Related Technologies

This site uses cookies and similar technologies to personalize content, measure traffic patterns, control security, track use and access of information on this site, and provide interest-based messages and advertising. Users can manage and block the use of cookies through their browser. Disabling or blocking certain cookies may limit the functionality of this site.

Do Not Track

This site currently does not respond to Do Not Track signals.

Security


Pearson uses appropriate physical, administrative and technical security measures to protect personal information from unauthorized access, use and disclosure.

Children


This site is not directed to children under the age of 13.

Marketing


Pearson may send or direct marketing communications to users, provided that

  • Pearson will not use personal information collected or processed as a K-12 school service provider for the purpose of directed or targeted advertising.
  • Such marketing is consistent with applicable law and Pearson's legal obligations.
  • Pearson will not knowingly direct or send marketing communications to an individual who has expressed a preference not to receive marketing.
  • Where required by applicable law, express or implied consent to marketing exists and has not been withdrawn.

Pearson may provide personal information to a third party service provider on a restricted basis to provide marketing solely on behalf of Pearson or an affiliate or customer for whom Pearson is a service provider. Marketing preferences may be changed at any time.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information


If a user's personally identifiable information changes (such as your postal address or email address), we provide a way to correct or update that user's personal data provided to us. This can be done on the Account page. If a user no longer desires our service and desires to delete his or her account, please contact us at customer-service@informit.com and we will process the deletion of a user's account.

Choice/Opt-out


Users can always make an informed choice as to whether they should proceed with certain services offered by InformIT. If you choose to remove yourself from our mailing list(s) simply visit the following page and uncheck any communication you no longer want to receive: www.informit.com/u.aspx.

Sale of Personal Information


Pearson does not rent or sell personal information in exchange for any payment of money.

While Pearson does not sell personal information, as defined in Nevada law, Nevada residents may email a request for no sale of their personal information to NevadaDesignatedRequest@pearson.com.

Supplemental Privacy Statement for California Residents


California residents should read our Supplemental privacy statement for California residents in conjunction with this Privacy Notice. The Supplemental privacy statement for California residents explains Pearson's commitment to comply with California law and applies to personal information of California residents collected in connection with this site and the Services.

Sharing and Disclosure


Pearson may disclose personal information, as follows:

  • As required by law.
  • With the consent of the individual (or their parent, if the individual is a minor)
  • In response to a subpoena, court order or legal process, to the extent permitted or required by law
  • To protect the security and safety of individuals, data, assets and systems, consistent with applicable law
  • In connection the sale, joint venture or other transfer of some or all of its company or assets, subject to the provisions of this Privacy Notice
  • To investigate or address actual or suspected fraud or other illegal activities
  • To exercise its legal rights, including enforcement of the Terms of Use for this site or another contract
  • To affiliated Pearson companies and other companies and organizations who perform work for Pearson and are obligated to protect the privacy of personal information consistent with this Privacy Notice
  • To a school, organization, company or government agency, where Pearson collects or processes the personal information in a school setting or on behalf of such organization, company or government agency.

Links


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that we are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of each and every web site that collects Personal Information. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this web site.

Requests and Contact


Please contact us about this Privacy Notice or if you have any requests or questions relating to the privacy of your personal information.

Changes to this Privacy Notice


We may revise this Privacy Notice through an updated posting. We will identify the effective date of the revision in the posting. Often, updates are made to provide greater clarity or to comply with changes in regulatory requirements. If the updates involve material changes to the collection, protection, use or disclosure of Personal Information, Pearson will provide notice of the change through a conspicuous notice on this site or other appropriate way. Continued use of the site after the effective date of a posted revision evidences acceptance. Please contact us if you have questions or concerns about the Privacy Notice or any objection to any revisions.

Last Update: November 17, 2020