Home > Articles > Programming

A Taste of Erlang, a Dynamic, Asynchronous Message-Passing Language

David Chisnall
  • PrintPrint
  • Share ThisShare This
  • DiscussDiscuss
Close WindowDavid Chisnall

David Chisnall

Learn more…

Inside Modern X11 Programming
Sep 18, 2009
Making JavaScript Fast, Part 2
Sep 15, 2009
Security in Your Pocket: OpenBSD on ARM
Sep 11, 2009
Making JavaScript Fast, Part 1
Sep 8, 2009
The Failure of the GPL
Aug 31, 2009
How Not To Optimize
Aug 21, 2009
A Half-Way Step to Apple’s Source Code: An Interview with David Chisnall
Jun 5, 2009
Advanced Flow Control for Objective-C
Jun 5, 2009
Erica Sadun on the iPhone SDK, OS X, and the Computing Landscape
Jun 5, 2009
From NeXTSTEP to Cocoa: Erik Buck on the Development of Cocoa and Objective-C
Jun 5, 2009
Fun with the Objective-C Runtime
Jun 5, 2009
Marcus Zarra and Matt Long on Core Animation
Jun 5, 2009
Steve Kochan on the Evolution of Objective-C
Jun 5, 2009
The Technology NeXT Gave the World
Jun 5, 2009
Where the Web and the Desktop Meet: An Interview with Lee Barney
Jun 5, 2009
Pandora: An Open Console
Jun 2, 2009
The Future of Wireless Networking
May 15, 2009
GNU or Linux?
May 11, 2009
Debugging C-Family Languages
Mar 27, 2009
How Small Is Your PC? The Rise of Netbooks and Other Small Form-Factor PCs
Mar 23, 2009
David Chisnall's CPU Feature Wishlist
Mar 13, 2009
The Dynamic Languages Renaissance
Jan 30, 2009
Robert Seacord on the CERT C Secure Coding Standard
Dec 15, 2008
Objective-C for C++ Programmers, Part 3
Nov 21, 2008
Objective-C for C++ Programmers, Part 2
Nov 14, 2008
Objective-C for C++ Programmers, Part 1
Nov 7, 2008
Writing Insecure C, Part 3
Oct 24, 2008
Writing Insecure C, Part 2
Oct 17, 2008
Writing Insecure C, Part 1
Oct 10, 2008
iRex iLiad e-Reader: Linux's Answer to the Kindle?
Aug 29, 2008
How It Works: Filesystems
Jun 13, 2008
How the LLVM Compiler Infrastructure Works
May 23, 2008
How It Works: Virtual Memory
May 21, 2008
What Is C For?
May 16, 2008
The Future of eBooks
Apr 25, 2008
Imagining an Open Network
Apr 18, 2008
Understanding How Xen Approaches Device Drivers
Mar 21, 2008
Examining the Legendary HURD Kernel
Mar 14, 2008
Competition Among Open Source Compilers
Feb 1, 2008
Inside Your OS: What is a Process Scheduler, and How Does it Work?
Jan 25, 2008
Bad UI of the Week: Read This (OK/Cancel)
Jan 18, 2008
The End of the Desktop Era
Jan 11, 2008
The What and Why of Open IM
Dec 28, 2007
A Look at the Modern X Server
Dec 21, 2007
The Future of Digital Media
Dec 14, 2007
The Future of Identity
Dec 7, 2007
Bad UI of the Week: Ask Forgiveness, Not Permission
Nov 21, 2007
Copyright Versus Free Software
Nov 16, 2007
Is Computer Science Dying?
Nov 9, 2007
A Brief History of Programming, Part 2
Nov 2, 2007
A Brief History of Programming, Part 1
Oct 26, 2007
The 700MHz Question: Will the Wireless Spectrum Auction Lead to Innovation or More of the Same?
Sep 28, 2007
Bad UI of the Week: The Menu Bar
Aug 24, 2007
The Dark Corners of x86
Aug 17, 2007
Bad UI of the Week: The Cross-Platform User Interface
Aug 17, 2007
Bad UI of the Week: The Mythical "is Like" Operator
Aug 10, 2007
Bad UI of the Week: Don't Make Me Tell You Twice...
Aug 3, 2007
Bad UI of the Week: Kettles and Washing Machines
Jul 27, 2007
The BBC iPlayer Controversy Explained
Jul 20, 2007
Bad UI of the Week: The Mitten Mouse
Jul 20, 2007
Bad User Interface of the Week: File It Under “Bad”
Jul 13, 2007
Bad User Interface of the Week: The DVD
Jul 6, 2007
A Roundup of Free Operating Systems
Jun 22, 2007
DragonFly BSD: UNIX for Clusters?
Jun 15, 2007
CPU Wars, Part 3: Put Your Left ARM In
May 18, 2007
CPU Wars, Part 2: POWER to the People
May 11, 2007
CPU Wars, Part 1: When the Chips Are Down
May 4, 2007
ZFS Uncovered
Apr 6, 2007
Vector Programming with GCC
Mar 30, 2007
Free Software Versus Open Source Software
Mar 16, 2007
What Programming Languages Should You Know?
Mar 9, 2007
Standardizing UNIX
Feb 2, 2007
Prolog: Logic Programming for Rapid Development
Jan 26, 2007
POSIX Parallel Programming, Part 3: Threads
Jan 19, 2007
POSIX Parallel Programming, Part 2: Message Passing
Jan 12, 2007
POSIX Parallel Programming, Part 1
Jan 5, 2007
The Nokia 770 Revisited
Dec 29, 2006
The Open Source Desktop Myth
Dec 22, 2006
Separating Style and Content: LaTeX and Typesetting
Dec 1, 2006
GNUstep: A Free Software alternative to OpenStep
Nov 10, 2006
Behind the Scenes of Objective-C 2.0
Nov 3, 2006
The Future of CPUs: What's After Multi-Core?
Oct 27, 2006
What Makes a Good Programming Language?
Oct 20, 2006
Emulation: Role-Playing for Computers
Oct 13, 2006
NetBSD: Not Just for Toasters
Oct 6, 2006
POSIX Asynchronous I/O
Sep 22, 2006
Breaking Down GPL Version 3
Aug 18, 2006
The Role of Binary Drivers in a Free OS
Aug 4, 2006
Security Is a UI Problem
Jul 28, 2006
Debunking the Myth of High-level Languages
Jul 14, 2006
A Taste of Erlang, a Dynamic, Asynchronous Message-Passing Language
Jun 30, 2006
Alternatives to LAMP
Jun 2, 2006
BSD Packaging Systems
May 26, 2006
DRM: Digital Rights or Digital Restrictions?
May 4, 2006
Introducing OpenBSD 3.9
Apr 28, 2006
The Need for Virtualization and Xen
Mar 31, 2006
Making Effective Software TCO Calculations
Mar 24, 2006
10 Things I Hate About U(NIX) Revisited: Readers Speak
Mar 17, 2006
Comparing Open Source Licenses: GPL vs. BSDL
Feb 3, 2006
BSD: The Other Free UNIX Family
Jan 20, 2006
Measuring the Effectiveness of Application Security Policies
Jan 13, 2006
The Cost of Free Software
Dec 9, 2005
Nokia 770 Internet Tablet Week-long Test Drive
Nov 18, 2005
10 Things I Hate About (U)NIX
Nov 4, 2005
The Lure of Open Source Software: Why Consider It for Your Business?
Oct 14, 2005

Sorry, this author hasn't posted any blogs.

Erlang is a descendant of Prolog, intended for high-availability, high-performance applications. David Chisnall explains why he likes it, despite Erlang's occasional minor irritations.

Regular readers will know that I find most so-called "modern" programming languages to be somewhat underwhelming. Occasionally, though, one comes along that provides a nice contrast. One of these is Erlang.

Erlang was originally designed by Ericsson for high-availability, high-performance applications, such as telephone switchboards. Since Ericsson’s market is telecommunications, not programming languages, they released it as Free Software, including an extensive runtime library. Improvements have been made by others, including the University of Uppsala, which contributed most of the High-Performance Erlang (HiPE) branch.

Being commercially supported Free Software is a good start. The fact that Erlang has already been used in real-world projects of significant scale is another point in its favor. This article is not intended as an in-depth tutorial on Erlang, but rather as a taste of what’s possible with the language.

’Scalable’ Is the New ’Fast’

It used to be that if your code ran quite quickly, a year later you could run it twice as fast for the same amount of money. These days, you’re much less likely to get a chip that’s twice as fast, but you may get one with twice as many cores. If your code is highly parallel, you can just spread it out a bit more.

To provide some context, the machine I was using as my testbed for the last project I wrote in Erlang was a 64-processor MIPS box, already several years old. A pair of Sun T1 chips can have as many active contexts as this machine, and eight of them can have as many actually executing as this old machine—and doing it faster. Within a few years, it seems likely that laptops will emerge with similar abilities to this old behemoth.

Two features of Erlang, both of which are built into the language, make it especially suited to writing scalable applications: process creation and message passing.

Erlang is interpreted on all platforms, but can be just-in-time compiled on x86 and SPARC. In the worst case, algorithms implemented in Erlang run at about one-tenth the speed of their C counterparts. Distributed algorithms can run faster. Yet Another Web Server (YAWS), written in Erlang, has been shown to be able to handle more concurrent connections than Apache on the same machine, and the ejabberd XMPP server is very well-regarded in the community.

  • Share ThisShare This
  • Your Account

Discussions

Make a New Comment

You must log in in order to post a comment.

Related Resources

Danny KalevMinutes from the October 2009 Meeting
By Danny Kalev on November 19, 2009 No Comments

The minutes from the Santa Cruz (October 2009) meeting are available here. Even if you're not a language layer at heart, I encourage you to read them.

Danny KalevA Reader's Opinion on Attributes
By Danny Kalev on October 20, 2009 No Comments

In August I dedicated a series to the debate about C++0x attributes. I believe that it covered the subject in a balanced and detailed way, but I keep getting complaints from C++ users who don't like attributes for various reasons. Here's a recent email I received from a Polish C++ programmer. While it  doesn't represent my opinion about attributes -- I'm rather neutral about this feature and consider it a "solution waiting for a problem" -- but it suggests that attributes are still a highly controversial issue that will haunt C++ for a long time. The email is quoted here with minor edits that and as usual, with all private details removed.

Danny KalevFollowup: The Web 2.0 Guy I Ain't
By Danny Kalev on October 16, 2009 1 Comment

Almost a year ago, I posted here The Web 2.0 Guy I Ain't. People wonder whether I still resist all those Web 2.0 features and technologies at the end of 2009.

See All Related Blogs

Informit Network