Comparing Open Source Licenses: GPL vs. BSDL
- Feb 3, 2006
- Two Licenses for Two Philosophies
- How the Licenses Arose
- Effects of Licensing on the Commercial Software World
Page 1 of 3
Next >
- Inside Modern X11 Programming
- Making JavaScript Fast, Part 2
- Security in Your Pocket: OpenBSD on ARM
- Making JavaScript Fast, Part 1
- The Failure of the GPL
- How Not To Optimize
- A Half-Way Step to Apple’s Source Code: An Interview with David Chisnall
- Advanced Flow Control for Objective-C
- Erica Sadun on the iPhone SDK, OS X, and the Computing Landscape
- From NeXTSTEP to Cocoa: Erik Buck on the Development of Cocoa and Objective-C
- Fun with the Objective-C Runtime
- Marcus Zarra and Matt Long on Core Animation
- Steve Kochan on the Evolution of Objective-C
- The Technology NeXT Gave the World
- Where the Web and the Desktop Meet: An Interview with Lee Barney
- Pandora: An Open Console
- The Future of Wireless Networking
- GNU or Linux?
- Debugging C-Family Languages
- How Small Is Your PC? The Rise of Netbooks and Other Small Form-Factor PCs
- David Chisnall's CPU Feature Wishlist
- The Dynamic Languages Renaissance
- Robert Seacord on the CERT C Secure Coding Standard
- Objective-C for C++ Programmers, Part 3
- Objective-C for C++ Programmers, Part 2
- Objective-C for C++ Programmers, Part 1
- Writing Insecure C, Part 3
- Writing Insecure C, Part 2
- Writing Insecure C, Part 1
- iRex iLiad e-Reader: Linux's Answer to the Kindle?
- How It Works: Filesystems
- How the LLVM Compiler Infrastructure Works
- How It Works: Virtual Memory
- What Is C For?
- The Future of eBooks
- Imagining an Open Network
- Understanding How Xen Approaches Device Drivers
- Examining the Legendary HURD Kernel
- Competition Among Open Source Compilers
- Inside Your OS: What is a Process Scheduler, and How Does it Work?
- Bad UI of the Week: Read This (OK/Cancel)
- The End of the Desktop Era
- The What and Why of Open IM
- A Look at the Modern X Server
- The Future of Digital Media
- The Future of Identity
- Bad UI of the Week: Ask Forgiveness, Not Permission
- Copyright Versus Free Software
- Is Computer Science Dying?
- A Brief History of Programming, Part 2
- A Brief History of Programming, Part 1
- The 700MHz Question: Will the Wireless Spectrum Auction Lead to Innovation or More of the Same?
- Bad UI of the Week: The Menu Bar
- The Dark Corners of x86
- Bad UI of the Week: The Cross-Platform User Interface
- Bad UI of the Week: The Mythical "is Like" Operator
- Bad UI of the Week: Don't Make Me Tell You Twice...
- Bad UI of the Week: Kettles and Washing Machines
- The BBC iPlayer Controversy Explained
- Bad UI of the Week: The Mitten Mouse
- Bad User Interface of the Week: File It Under “Bad”
- Bad User Interface of the Week: The DVD
- A Roundup of Free Operating Systems
- DragonFly BSD: UNIX for Clusters?
- CPU Wars, Part 3: Put Your Left ARM In
- CPU Wars, Part 2: POWER to the People
- CPU Wars, Part 1: When the Chips Are Down
- ZFS Uncovered
- Vector Programming with GCC
- Free Software Versus Open Source Software
- What Programming Languages Should You Know?
- Standardizing UNIX
- Prolog: Logic Programming for Rapid Development
- POSIX Parallel Programming, Part 3: Threads
- POSIX Parallel Programming, Part 2: Message Passing
- POSIX Parallel Programming, Part 1
- The Nokia 770 Revisited
- The Open Source Desktop Myth
- Separating Style and Content: LaTeX and Typesetting
- GNUstep: A Free Software alternative to OpenStep
- Behind the Scenes of Objective-C 2.0
- The Future of CPUs: What's After Multi-Core?
- What Makes a Good Programming Language?
- Emulation: Role-Playing for Computers
- NetBSD: Not Just for Toasters
- POSIX Asynchronous I/O
- Breaking Down GPL Version 3
- The Role of Binary Drivers in a Free OS
- Security Is a UI Problem
- Debunking the Myth of High-level Languages
- A Taste of Erlang, a Dynamic, Asynchronous Message-Passing Language
- Alternatives to LAMP
- BSD Packaging Systems
- DRM: Digital Rights or Digital Restrictions?
- Introducing OpenBSD 3.9
- The Need for Virtualization and Xen
- Making Effective Software TCO Calculations
- 10 Things I Hate About U(NIX) Revisited: Readers Speak
- Comparing Open Source Licenses: GPL vs. BSDL
- BSD: The Other Free UNIX Family
- Measuring the Effectiveness of Application Security Policies
- The Cost of Free Software
- Nokia 770 Internet Tablet Week-long Test Drive
- 10 Things I Hate About (U)NIX
- The Lure of Open Source Software: Why Consider It for Your Business?
Sorry, this author hasn't posted any blogs.
Like this article? We recommend
Open Source Licensing: Software Freedom and Intellectual Property Law
David Chisnall compares the two most popular software licenses in the free and open source software (F/OSS) communities: the GNU General Public License (GPL) and the Berkeley Software Distribution License (BSDL). Each has advantages, but the distinctions are sometimes quite subtle.
Two Licenses for Two Philosophies
In the free and open source software (F/OSS) communities, there are two common free software licenses, originating from two very different philosophies:
- The Berkeley Software Distribution License (BSDL) is a very simple license. It states that you may not claim that you wrote the software under the license, and that you must state somewhere who did write it, but apart from that you can do anything you like with the code—including distributing binary copies of it and any derived works.
- The GNU General Public License (GPL) is based on the idea of copyleft—the philosophical opposite of copyright, built using existing copyright laws. This aspect of the GPL is sometimes referred to as "viral," since any derived work of a GPL’d product is covered under the GPL, including the parts not originally licensed under the GPL. For example, it’s possible to take the Linux kernel (GPL) and add some BSDL code to it. The result, as a whole, is licensed under the GPL; however, the BSDL component on its own is also still covered by the BSDL.
The reason the GPL exists is to enforce the four freedoms of the Free Software Foundation, which I’ve outlined in a previous article. These freedoms are expressly granted by the GPL. The copyleft nature of the GPL means that any derived work of GPL software must also respect the four freedoms—in effect, it says that if you want to benefit from free software, you must play by the rules of free software.
These two licenses are not the only ones used by F/OSS. Others licenses are similar:
- The MIT license under which X11 is distributed is a slightly more lenient version of the BSD license, removing the requirement for attribution in binary-only distributions.
- The Lesser GPL (LGPL) removes some of the constraints of the GPL, and is intended for libraries that might be used in non-libre software.
- There are also a whole set with slightly differing terms, including some—such as Apple’s and Sun’s licenses—which expressly allow the inclusion of closed-source components.
Page 1 of 3
Next >
Account Sign In
View your cart