Home > Articles > Operating Systems, Server > Linux/UNIX/Open Source

Yellow Dog Linux for the Macintosh: Popping the Kernel

  • PrintPrint
  • Share ThisShare This
  • DiscussDiscuss
Moving to the Linux Business Desktop

Like this article? We recommend
Moving to the Linux Business Desktop

Yellow Dog? It isn't a retriever; it's a Linux for Mac folk. In this article, Larry Loeb looks at whether Linux (in general) is for you and whether Yellow Dog Linux (specifically) will do what you want and need.

Yellow Dog Linux has recently upgraded to version 4.0. With this release, it has become the pre-eminent Linux implementation for the Macintosh. Although OS X users who are intrigued by the power and the speed of Linux will seriously want to consider this version, Linux is not for everyone. There is no hand-holding, and you can drive the Mac right off a cliff into a kernel panic.

This article looks at the implementation and the reasons for using Linux to help you make your choice.

The Author Declares a Bias

Let me make one point clear at the beginning: I like Yellow Dog Linux (YDL). Heck, I bought a YDL hat at the last "real" Boston MacExpo that I still wear. YDL is a Mac implementation of the Red Hat distribution, which is based on the Fedora 2.2 Linux core. However, liking it in the abstract doesn't mean I can't hit it upside the head some and complain. Because I can do that with glee, in the open source spirit, to make it a better product. I don't in any way think it's rotten; indeed, you put this kind of effort only into the things you like and want to do better. So, remember that when and if I yell about something, I do so out of concern, not animosity.

Having said all that, YDL 4.0 is the first YDL version that is ready for use by the general public. Earlier versions assumed that you had some knowledge of Unix and how to install it. That expertise may have been there in those early adopters who needed a Mac Linux for a specific purpose and were prepared to undergo the aggravation that was required to make it work. But this version automates the install process so that even a non-wizard can do it. The setup and configuration process seems far less onerous to me—and that's always been a stumbling block with Linux. Mac folk are used to things working out of the box, with the software being intelligent enough to take care of itself. Linux, like Unix, needs a firm hand for guidance; but YDL 4.0's graphical interface makes the install process more transparent and less convoluted.

  • Share ThisShare This
  • Your Account

Discussions

Make a New Comment

You must log in in order to post a comment.

Related Resources

Danny KalevMinutes from the October 2009 Meeting
By Danny Kalev on November 19, 2009 No Comments

The minutes from the Santa Cruz (October 2009) meeting are available here. Even if you're not a language layer at heart, I encourage you to read them.

Danny KalevA Reader's Opinion on Attributes
By Danny Kalev on October 20, 2009 No Comments

In August I dedicated a series to the debate about C++0x attributes. I believe that it covered the subject in a balanced and detailed way, but I keep getting complaints from C++ users who don't like attributes for various reasons. Here's a recent email I received from a Polish C++ programmer. While it  doesn't represent my opinion about attributes -- I'm rather neutral about this feature and consider it a "solution waiting for a problem" -- but it suggests that attributes are still a highly controversial issue that will haunt C++ for a long time. The email is quoted here with minor edits that and as usual, with all private details removed.

Danny KalevFollowup: The Web 2.0 Guy I Ain't
By Danny Kalev on October 16, 2009 1 Comment

Almost a year ago, I posted here The Web 2.0 Guy I Ain't. People wonder whether I still resist all those Web 2.0 features and technologies at the end of 2009.

See All Related Blogs

Informit Network