Home > Articles > Web Services > Cloud Computing

  • Print
  • + Share This
This chapter is from the book

Bibliography

[1]

M. Liberman, “Morphology.” Linguistics 001, Lecture 7, University of Pennsylvania, 2009. http://www.ling.upenn.edu/courses/Fall_2009/ling001/morphology.html.

[2]

M. Haspelmath, “The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax,” Folia Linguistica, vol. 45, 2011.

[3]

H. Kučera and W. N. Francis, Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press, 1967.

[4]

S. B. Cohen and N. A. Smith, “Joint morphological and syntactic disambiguation,” in Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL), pp. 208–217, 2007.

[5]

T. Nakagawa, “Chinese and Japanese word segmentation using word-level and character-level information,” in Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 466–472, 2004.

[6]

H. Shin and H. You, “Hybrid n-gram probability estimation in morphologically rich languages,” in Proceedings of the 23rd Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, 2009.

[7]

D. Z. Hakkani-Tür, K. Oflazer, and G. Tür, “Statistical morphological disambiguation for agglutinative languages,” in Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 285–291, 2000.

[8]

G. T. Stump, Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

[9]

K. R. Beesley and L. Karttunen, Finite State Morphology. CSLI Studies in Computational Linguistics, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 2003.

[10]

M. Baerman, D. Brown, and G. G. Corbett, The Syntax-Morphology Interface. A Study of Syncretism. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

[11]

B. Roark and R. Sproat, Computational Approaches to Morphology and Syntax. Oxford Surveys in Syntax and Morphology, New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.

[12]

O. Smrž, “Functional Arabic morphology. Formal system and implementation,” PhD thesis, Charles University in Prague, 2007.

[13]

H. Eifring and R. Theil, Linguistics for Students of Asian and African Languages. Universitetet i Oslo, 2005.

[14]

B. Bickel and J. Nichols, “Fusion of selected inflectional formatives & exponence of selected inflectional formatives,” in The World Atlas of Language Structures Online (M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil, and B. Comrie, eds.), ch. 20 & 21, Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, 2008.

[15]

W. Fischer, A Grammar of Classical Arabic. Trans. Jonathan Rodgers. Yale Language Series, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002.

[16]

K. C. Ryding, A Reference Grammar of Modern Standard Arabic. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

[17]

O. Smrž and V. Bielický, “ElixirFM.” Functional Arabic Morphology, SourceForge.net, 2010. http://sourceforge.net/projects/elixer-fm/.

[18]

T. Kamei, R. KMno, and E. Chino, eds., The Sanseido Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Volume 6 Terms (in Japanese). Sanseido, 1996.

[19]

F. Karlsson, Finnish Grammar. Helsinki: Werner Söderström Osakenyhtiö, 1987.

[20]

J. Hajič and B. Hladká, “Tagging inflective languages: Prediction of morphological categories for a rich, structured tagset,” in Proceedings of COLING-ACL 1998, pp. 483– 490, 1998.

[21]

J. Hajič, “Morphological tagging: Data vs. dictionaries,” in Proceedings of NAACLANLP 2000, pp. 94–101, 2000.

[22]

N. Habash and O. Rambow, “Arabic tokenization, part-of-speech tagging and morphological disambiguation in one fell swoop,” in Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’05), pp. 573–580, 2005.

[23]

N. A. Smith, D. A. Smith, and R. W. Tromble, “Context-based morphological disambiguation with random fields,” in Proceedings of HLT/EMNLP 2005, pp. 475–482, 2005.

[24]

J. Hajič, O. Smrž, T. Buckwalter, and H. Jin, “Feature-based tagger of approximations of functional Arabic morphology,” in Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT 2005), pp. 53–64, 2005.

[25]

T. Buckwalter, “Issues in Arabic orthography and morphology analysis,” in COLING 2004 Computational Approaches to Arabic Script-based Languages, pp. 31–34, 2004.

[26]

R. Nelken and S. M. Shieber, “Arabic diacritization using finite-state transducers,” in Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Computational Approaches to Semitic Languages, pp. 79–86, 2005.

[27]

I. Zitouni, J. S. Sorensen, and R. Sarikaya, “Maximum entropy based restoration of Arabic diacritics,” in Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 577–584, 2006.

[28]

N. Habash and O. Rambow, “Arabic diacritization through full morphological tagging,” in Human Language Technologies 2007: The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics; Companion Volume, Short Papers, pp. 53–56, 2007.

[29]

G. Huet, “Lexicon-directed segmentation and tagging of Sanskrit,” in Proceedings of the XIIth World Sanskrit Conference, pp. 307–325, 2003.

[30]

G. Huet, “Formal structure of Sanskrit text: Requirements analysis for a mechanical Sanskrit processor,” in Sanskrit Computational Linguistics: First and Second International Symposia (G. Huet, A. Kulkarni, and P. Scharf, eds.), vol. 5402 of LNAI, pp. 162–199, Berlin: Springer, 2009.

[31]

F. Katamba and J. Stonham, Morphology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.

[32]

L. Bauer, Morphological Productivity, Cambridge Studies in Linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

[33]

R. H. Baayen, Word Frequency Distributions, Text, Speech and Language Technology. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.

[34]

A. Kilgarriff, “Googleology is bad science,” Computational Linguistics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 147–151, 2007.

[35]

H.-C. Kwon and Y.-S. Chae, “A dictionary-based morphological analysis,” in Proceedings of Natural Language Processing Pacific Rim Symposium, pp. 178–185, 1991.

[36]

D.-B. Kim, K.-S. Choi, and K.-H. Lee, “A computational model of Korean morphological analysis: A prediction-based approach,” Journal of East Asian Linguistics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 183–215, 1996.

[37]

A. Halevy, P. Norvig, and F. Pereira, “The unreasonable effectiveness of data,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 8–12, 2009.

[38]

R. M. Kaplan and M. Kay, “Regular models of phonological rule systems,” Computational Linguistics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 331–378, 1994.

[39]

K. Koskenniemi, “Two-level morphology: A general computational model for word form recognition and production,” PhD thesis, University of Helsinki, 1983.

[40]

R. Sproat, Morphology and Computation. ACL–MIT Press Series in Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.

[41]

D.-B. Kim, S.-J. Lee, K.-S. Choi, and G.-C. Kim, “A two-level morphological analysis of Korean,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 535–539, 1994.

[42]

S.-Z. Lee and H.-C. Rim, “Korean morphology with elementary two-level rules and rule features,” in Proceedings of the Pacific Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 182–187, 1997.

[43]

N.-R. Han, “Klex: A finite-state trancducer lexicon of Korean,” in Finite-state Methods and Natural Language Processing: 5th International Workshop, FSMNLP 2005, pp. 67–77, Springer, 2006.

[44]

M. Kay, “Nonconcatenative finite-state morphology,” in Proceedings of the Third Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL (EACL-87), pp. 2–10, ACL, 1987.

[45]

K. R. Beesley, “Arabic morphology using only finite-state operations,” in COLINGACL’98 Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Approaches to Semitic languages, pp. 50–57, 1998.

[46]

G. A. Kiraz, Computational Nonlinear Morphology with Emphasis on Semitic Languages. Studies in Natural Language Processing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

[47]

N. Habash, O. Rambow, and G. Kiraz, “Morphological analysis and generation for Arabic dialects,” in Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Computational Approaches to Semitic Languages, pp. 17–24, 2005.

[48]

H. Skoumalová, “A Czech morphological lexicon,” in Proceedings of the Third Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Phonology, pp. 41–47, 1997.

[49]

R. Sedláček and P. Smrž, “A new Czech morphological analyser ajka,” in Text, Speech and Dialogue, vol. 2166, pp. 100–107, Berlin: Springer, 2001.

[50]

K. Oflazer, “Computational morphology.” ESSLLI 2006 European Summer School in Logic, Language, and Information, 2006.

[51]

C. Pollard and I. A. Sag, Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.

[52]

R. Evans and G. Gazdar, “DATR: A language for lexical knowledge representation,” Computational Linguistics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 167–216, 1996.

[53]

T. Erjavec, “Unification, inheritance, and paradigms in the morphology of natural languages,” PhD thesis, University of Ljubljana, 1996.

[54]

B. Carpenter, The Logic of Typed Feature Structures. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science 32, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

[55]

S. M. Shieber, Constraint-Based Grammar Formalisms: Parsing and Type Inference for Natural and Computer Languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.

[56]

S. Bird and T. M. Ellison, “One-level phonology: Autosegmental representations and rules as finite automata,” Computational Linguistics, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 55–90, 1994.

[57]

S. Bird and P. Blackburn, “A logical approach to Arabic phonology,” in Proceedings of the 5th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 89–94, 1991.

[58]

G. G. Corbett and N. M. Fraser, “Network morphology: A DATR account of Russian nominal inflection,” Journal of Linguistics, vol. 29, pp. 113–142, 1993.

[59]

J. Hajič, “Unification morphology grammar. Software system for multilanguage morphological analysis,” PhD thesis, Charles University in Prague, 1994.

[60]

K. Megerdoomian, “Unification-based Persian morphology,” in Proceedings of CICLing 2000, 2000.

[61]

R. Finkel and G. Stump, “Generating Hebrew verb morphology by default inheritance hierarchies,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Approaches to Semitic Languages, pp. 9–18, 2002.

[62]

S. R. Al-Najem, “Inheritance-based approach to Arabic verbal root-and-pattern morphology,” in Arabic Computational Morphology. Knowledge-based and Empirical Methods (A. Soudi, A. van den Bosch, and G. Neumann, eds.), vol. 38, pp. 67–88, Berlin: Springer, 2007.

[63]

S. Köprü and J. Miller, “A unification based approach to the morphological analysis and generation of Arabic,” in CAASL-3: Third Workshop on Computational Approaches to Arabic Script-based Languages, 2009.

[64]

M. Forsberg and A. Ranta, “Functional morphology,” in Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Functional Programming, ICFP 2004, pp. 213–223, 2004.

[65]

A. Ranta, “Grammatical Framework: A type-theoretical grammar formalism,” Journal of Functional Programming, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 145–189, 2004.

[66]

P. Ljunglöf, “Pure functional parsing. An advanced tutorial,” Licenciate thesis, Göteborg University & Chalmers University of Technology, 2002.

[67]

G. Huet, “The Zen computational linguistics toolkit,” ESSLLI 2002 European Summer School in Logic, Language, and Information, 2002.

[68]

G. Huet, “A functional toolkit for morphological and phonological processing, application to a Sanskrit tagger,” Journal of Functional Programming, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 573–614, 2005.

[69]

M. Humayoun, H. Hammarström, and A. Ranta, “Urdu morphology, orthography and lexicon extraction,” in CAASL-2: Second Workshop on Computational Approaches to Arabic Script-based Languages, pp. 59–66, 2007.

[70]

A. Dada and A. Ranta, “Implementing an open source Arabic resource grammar in GF,” in Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics (M. A. Mughazy, ed.), vol. XX, pp. 209– 231, John Benjamins, 2007.

[71]

A. Ranta, “Grammatical Framework.” Programming Language for Multilingual Grammar Applications, http://www.grammaticalframework.org/, 2010.

[72]

J. Baldridge, S. Chatterjee, A. Palmer, and B. Wing, “DotCCG and VisCCG: Wiki and programming paradigms for improved grammar engineering with OpenCCG,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Grammar Engineering Across Frameworks, 2007.

[73]

H. Hammarström, “Unsupervised learning of morphology and the languages of the world,” PhD thesis, Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg, 2009.

[74]

J. A. Goldsmith, “Segmentation and morphology,” in Computational Linguistics and Natural Language Processing Handbook (A. Clark, C. Fox, and S. Lappin, eds.), pp. 364–393, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.

[75]

D. Yarowsky and R. Wicentowski, “Minimally supervised morphological analysis by multimodal alignment,” in Proceedings of the 38th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 207–216, 2000.

[76]

P. Schone and D. Jurafsky, “Knowledge-free induction of inflectional morphologies,” in Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 183–191, 2001.

[77]

S. Neuvel and S. A. Fulop, “Unsupervised learning of morphology without morphemes,” in Proceedings of the ACL-02 Workshop on Morphological and Phonological Learning, pp. 31–40, 2002.

[78]

N. Hathout, “Acquistion of the morphological structure of the lexicon based on lexical similarity and formal analogy,” in Coling 2008: Proceedings of the 3rd Textgraphs Workshop on Graph-based Algorithms for Natural Language Processing, pp. 1–8, 2008.

[79]

J. Goldsmith, “Unsupervised learning of the morphology of a natural language,” Computational Linguistics, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 153–198, 2001.

[80]

H. Johnson and J. Martin, “Unsupervised learning of morphology for English and Inuktikut,” in Companion Volume of the Proceedings of the Human Language Technologies: The Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2003: Short Papers, pp. 43–45, 2003.

[81]

M. Creutz and K. Lagus, “Induction of a simple morphology for highly-inflecting languages,” in Proceedings of the 7th Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Phonology, pp. 43–51, 2004.

[82]

M. Creutz and K. Lagus, “Unsupervised models for morpheme segmentation and morphology learning,” ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–34, 2007.

[83]

C. Monson, J. Carbonell, A. Lavie, and L. Levin, “ParaMor: Minimally supervised induction of paradigm structure and morphological analysis,” in Proceedings of Ninth Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Morphology and Phonology, pp. 117–125, 2007.

[84]

F. M. Liang, “Word Hy-phen-a-tion by Com-put-er,” PhD thesis, Stanford University, 1983.

[85]

V. Demberg, “A language-independent unsupervised model for morphological segmentation,” in Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pp. 920–927, 2007.

[86]

A. Clark, “Supervised and unsupervised learning of Arabic morphology,” in Arabic Computational Morphology. Knowledge-based and Empirical Methods (A. Soudi, A. van den Bosch, and G. Neumann, eds.), vol. 38, pp. 181–200, Berlin: Springer, 2007.

[87]

A. Xanthos, Apprentissage automatique de la morphologie: le cas des structures racineschème. Sciences pour la communication, Bern: Peter Lang, 2008.

[88]

B. Snyder and R. Barzilay, “Unsupervised multilingual learning for morphological segmentation,” in Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, pp. 737–745, 2008.

[89]

H. Poon, C. Cherry, and K. Toutanova, “Unsupervised morphological segmentation with log-linear models,” in Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 209–217, 2009.

[90]

S. Della Pietra, V. Della Pietra, and J. Lafferty, “Inducing features of random fields,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 380–393, 1997.

  • + Share This
  • 🔖 Save To Your Account