Home > Articles > Networking > Routing & Switching

  • Print
  • + Share This
This chapter is from the book

This chapter is from the book

Introduction

Unlike shared-bus architectures such as PCI and PCI-X, where traffic is visible to each device and routing is mainly a concern of bridges, PCI Express devices are dependent on each other to accept traffic or forward it in the direction of the ultimate recipient.

As illustrated in Figure 3-1 on page 106, a PCI Express topology consists of independent, point-to-point links connecting each device with one or more neighbors. As traffic arrives at the inbound side of a link interface (called the ingress port), the device checks for errors, then makes one of three decisions:

  1. Accept the traffic and use it internally.

  2. Forward the traffic to the appropriate outbound (egress) port.

  3. Reject the traffic because it is neither the intended target nor an interface to it (note that there are also other reasons why traffic may be rejected)

03fig01.jpgFigure 3-1. Multi-Port PCI Express Devices Have Routing Responsibilities

Receivers Check For Three Types of Link Traffic

Assuming a link is fully operational, the physical layer receiver interface of each device is prepared to monitor the logical idle condition and detect the arrival of the three types of link traffic: Ordered Sets, DLLPs, and TLPs. Using control (K) symbols which accompany the traffic to determine framing boundaries and traffic type, PCI Express devices then make a distinction between traffic which is local to the link vs. traffic which may require routing to other links (e.g. TLPs). Local link traffic, which includes Ordered Sets and Data Link Layer Packets (DLLPs), isn't forwarded and carries no routing information. Transaction Layer Packets (TLPs) can and do move from link to link, using routing information contained in the packet headers.

Multi-port Devices Assume the Routing Burden

It should be apparent in Figure 3-1 on page 106 that devices with multiple PCI Express ports are responsible for handling their own traffic as well as forwarding other traffic between ingress ports and any enabled egress ports. Also note that while peer-peer transaction support is required of switches, it is optional for a multi-port Root Complex. It is up to the system designer to account for peer-to-peer traffic when selecting devices and laying out a motherboard.

Endpoints Have Limited Routing Responsibilities

It should also be apparent in Figure 3-1 on page 106 that endpoint devices have a single link interface and lack the ability to route inbound traffic to other links. For this reason, and because they don't reside on shared busses, endpoints never expect to see ingress port traffic which is not intended for them (this is different than shared-bus PCI(X), where devices commonly decode addresses and commands not targeting them). Endpoint routing is limited to accepting or rejecting transactions presented to them.

System Routing Strategy Is Programmed

Before transactions can be generated by a requester, accepted by the completer, and forwarded by any devices in the path between the two, all devices must be configured to enforce the system transaction routing scheme. Routing is based on traffic type, system memory and IO address assignments, etc. In keeping with PCI plug-and-play configuration methods, each PCI express device is discovered, memory and IO address resources are assigned to them, and switch/bridge devices are programmed to forward transactions on their behalf. Once routing is programmed, bus mastering and target address decoding are enabled. Thereafter, devices are prepared to generate, accept, forward, or reject transactions as necessary.

  • + Share This
  • 🔖 Save To Your Account