Home > Articles > Software Development & Management > Agile

A Contemporary Framework for Agile Product Management in the Enterprise

Dean Leffingwell
  • PrintPrint
  • Share ThisShare This
  • DiscussDiscuss
Dean Leffingwell, author of Scaling Software Agility: Best Practices for Large Enterprises, discusses the changing role of product management in the enterprise during the transition to Agile development methods.

My article Five Phases of Disillusionment in Pre-Agile Waterfall Development describes some of the dysfunctional behaviors and mistrust that may be built into our systems prior to the Agile transition. In this article, we'll move to a more positive and enlightened view of the changing role of product management.

What's Different About Product Management in Agile?

The role of the product manager must change as the organization moves from waterfall development to Agile development. The following table points out some of the differences. Adapting to all the behaviors in the column at right is a substantial change for the newly Agile enterprise product manager.

PM Responsibility

Traditional

Agile

Understand customer needs

Up front and discontinuous.

Constant interaction.

Document requirements

Fully elaborated in Marketing Requirements Document or Product Requirements Document (PRD)

Coarsely documented in vision. Constant verbal communication to team.

Scheduling

Plan a one-time delivery, much later.

Continuous near-term roadmap.

Prioritize requirements

Not at all, or one time only in PRD.

Reprioritize at every release and iteration.

Validate requirements

N/A (QA responsibility).

Involved with iterations and each release. Smaller, more frequent releases.

Manage change

Prohibit change[md]weekly Change Control Board meetings.

Adjust at every release and iteration boundary.

  • Share ThisShare This
  • Your Account

Discussions

Make a New Comment

You must log in in order to post a comment.

Related Resources

Danny KalevMinutes from the October 2009 Meeting
By Danny Kalev on November 19, 2009 No Comments

The minutes from the Santa Cruz (October 2009) meeting are available here. Even if you're not a language layer at heart, I encourage you to read them.

Danny KalevA Reader's Opinion on Attributes
By Danny Kalev on October 20, 2009 No Comments

In August I dedicated a series to the debate about C++0x attributes. I believe that it covered the subject in a balanced and detailed way, but I keep getting complaints from C++ users who don't like attributes for various reasons. Here's a recent email I received from a Polish C++ programmer. While it  doesn't represent my opinion about attributes -- I'm rather neutral about this feature and consider it a "solution waiting for a problem" -- but it suggests that attributes are still a highly controversial issue that will haunt C++ for a long time. The email is quoted here with minor edits that and as usual, with all private details removed.

Danny KalevFollowup: The Web 2.0 Guy I Ain't
By Danny Kalev on October 16, 2009 1 Comment

Almost a year ago, I posted here The Web 2.0 Guy I Ain't. People wonder whether I still resist all those Web 2.0 features and technologies at the end of 2009.

See All Related Blogs

Informit Network